Bike Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Bike Reviews

Ibis Mojo

We test the first bike from the reborn Ibis - and there's not a steel tube in sight


Posted: 7 December 2006
by Mike Davis

Ibis Mojo
  • Ibis Mojo
  • £1,699 frame only (naked carbon, Fox RP23 shock; +£100 for paint, +£200 for DHX Air shock). Complete bikes from £3,099
  • Stif Mountain Bikes (www.stif.co.uk, 0113 225 1111)
  • Sub-6lb frame
  • 140mm travel
  • DW-Link suspension

Pushed for time? Skip straight to the verdict.

Ibis is a company with a long, if erratic, history. It was founded by Scot Nicol in 1981, hand-building steel frames. It grew and diversified, making road, mountain, 'cross, tandem and full-suspension bikes in steel and titanium. After running Ibis for nearly 20 years, Nicol sold it. And twenty months later it went bust. But now it's back, with the founder once again at the helm. Nicol is characteristically self-deprecating about his role - he says that he's "manning the welding torch now that we aren't welding anything."

The new Ibis currently produces just two models - the Silk road bike and the Mojo mountain bike, reviving the name of Ibis's legendary steel hardtail. You can probably guess which one we're looking at here...

Ibis Mojo - side view Ibis Mojo head badge Ibis Mojo head tube ibismojo_swingarm_lo (4K) ibismojo_swingarm2_lo (5K) ibismojo_toplink_lo (4K) ibismojo_qr_lo (3K)

Frame

The old Ibis made frames from chromoly or titanium tubes welded together. Chromoly and titanium were the staples. But the new Ibis eschews such things as tubes and metal - the Mojo (and the Silk road bike) are all carbon fibre. Well, nearly all - certain key parts are aluminium, like the threads in the BB shell, the dropouts, the linkages and so on.

Some carbon fibre frames stick with straight lines and round tube sections even if they're built as monococques, but Ibis has gone to town with the possibilities - the Mojo is all curves, swoops and smooth lines. It's one of the very few bikes that's actually a pleasure to clean - you find yourself just buffing parts of it one more time. At the very front, the head tube carries an integrated headset, while the full-length seat tube means plenty of scope for dropping your saddle.

The carbon fibre swingarm is a work of art. It's all one piece, with aluminium dropouts and disc mount. Again, it's all very organic and smooth, which certainly seems to prevent mud gathering in it. Tyre clearance is adequate, although a little more around the chainstays would be welcome.

Between the two halves of the frame are the short forged linkages of the DW-Link suspension system. You don't see the fruits of Dave Weagle's kinematic ponderings on all that many bikes - Ibis, Iron Horse and Independent Fabrications are the only manufacturers using it. It'd certainly be good to see it getting more exposure, perhaps even on brands that begin with letters other than "I". It's a short-link design, with the arrangement of pivots designed to achieve the usual goals of minimum pedal feedback, brake effects and bob with maximum plushness and acceleration.

One particularly interesting aspect of the construction is that the pivot bearings aren't directly replaceable. Instead if/when the bearings get tired you simply unbolt and replace the whole linkage, pivots and all, which saves a lot of tedious drifting and hammering. New linkage assemblies should be reasonably priced.

Then there are all the little details - the concealed upper link pivots, the replaceable stainless steel plate on the drive-side chainstay to ward off chainsuck damage and the most highly-polished seat quick-release that we've ever seen. The test bike was in a raw carbon finish, but there's also a choice of painted colours. We rather like "Guinness foam"...

Components

A little unusually for such a high-end frame, you can get a Mojo as a variety of complete bikes without having to go through the time ans expense of speccing every part yourself. Stif offers a range of UK builds starting from £3,099 for a RockShox Lyrik 2-Step/SRAM X-9 level spec and running up to £3,849 for a Fox 36 TALAS RC-2/SRAM X-0 bike.

The demo bike came with a selection of sensible parts. Race Face Atlas cranks, Hope hubs, Mavic 717 rims, WTB Weirwolf tyres, XT shifters and mechs, Hayes brakes, Fi:zi'k Aliente seat, Thomson post, Race Face stem and a pair of rather tall Ibis bars. With no particular concession to weight saving, the whole Large bike came in at around 28lb. There's certainly scope to drop a whole chunk off that if you're so inclined, although in our world that's a perfectly acceptable weight for a bike.

Ride

We've ridden a lot of bikes, and while most of them are really rather good these days it's been a while since something actually blew us away. But that's exactly what the Mojo did. Whatever you think about the looks or the price, this is a stunning bike to ride. Somehow it manages to feel both light and stout, have both less and more travel than it actually does and combine high-speed stability with low-speed manouevrability.

A sub-6lb frame is certainly light for its travel, but the all-carbon construction and short linkages result in a really stiff platform - when you're pushing on it feels as solid as a 10lb aluminium frame. It also doesn't clonk and rattle as much as some carbon frames, which is an acoustic property that tends to give an impression of fragility.

The relaxed-at-the-front, steep-at-the-back geometry is nigh-on faultless for all-round riding. Sit down and you find your weight committed forward, keeping the front end running straight on climbs and biting in turns. Stand up and it's easy to hang back and let the fairly shallow head angle keep things stable on the steeps. If this was our bike we'd put a slightly lower-rise bar on it, though.

Dave Weagle's DW-Link suspension certainly lives up to its promises - you get small-bump sensitivity, mid-range plushness and the ability to swallow big hits, all without distracting pedal feedback and with a minimum of bob. Best of all, unlike some bikes, the Mojo somehow always feels like the tool for the job. You never feel like you're overburdened with travel and rarely feel like you could do with substantially more. It's one of those bikes that offers completely transparent performance - it doesn't make its presence felt, it just gets on with the job. And that makes it a very rewarding bike indeed.

Totally sorted handling and suspension, beautifully made, light but solid, fantastic details, absolutely stonkingly good ride

Somewhat pricy, looks not to everyone's taste, a smidgen more tyre clearance would be welcome


Verdict

Just when you think that bikes can't possibly get any better, along comes the Ibis Mojo. Yes, it's expensive. Yes, its looks are an acquired taste. But it's just fantastic to ride. It doesn't care if you want to pootle or hammer - whatever you do it'll flatter and encourage. It never feels like too much bike, it never feels like not enough. It's just there, doing what you want it to do. Purists may bemoan the fact that the reborn Ibis hasn't launched a range of steel hardtails, but the new Mojo is destined to be a classic in its own right. We had a really hard time letting it go...


Performance Value Overall


Previous article Previous article:
Howies sale in London
Next article:Next article
Turner 2007

Discuss this story

That is a piece of bike and engineering perfection, and it appears to ride better then it looks!
its just so organic, god i would hate to own one and scratch it, i think i would cry for weeks!
Posted: 07/12/2006 20:25

Oh dear lord, it's the mostest fugliest thing I've ever seen, *atempts to gouge eyes out...*

Surely they could have made it just a little better looking, surely!
Posted: 07/12/2006 20:38

I shall ask Santa for one. Will it go down my chimney?
Posted: 07/12/2006 20:39

can i just say..the lads at stif..let me..yes me.. take one out for the day...
Posted: 07/12/2006 21:21

I cant see the ugly point .. I ride an IF hardtail which is a beauty, but I really like that bike.. it represent great value for such a niche brand packing so much hi tech.. If only they made a 4 inch sub 5LB version then I would have cheque book in hand. And.. it Will last and last.. I know of three Ibis's still being hammered daily from the first time round.. big up Scott Nicol.. lets halt the advance of everyone riding Specialized and trek!
Posted: 07/12/2006 22:26

I like that and it has the same back end as an Iron Horse Mk3 so it should ride nice


Posted: 08/12/2006 07:32

its looks nicer in blue.
Posted: 08/12/2006 07:37


Yeah I like the look of the painted versions more than the carbon too.


Posted: 08/12/2006 07:57

can i just say the bike i took out. i did brake it..the chain came off and got stuck..in the frame and the pivet bolt..the chain bent...i had to rag it out..and it left a right mark in the frame...but i no now..on the new frame..the pivet bolt has been change..its more flater to the frame..you dont get much feed back from the bike...the carbon frame sucks it up...i liked my giant trance better..£1700 for a frame..i think at that price they may be better out there..but who am i to say...and i do think it as the look of a nomad..
Posted: 08/12/2006 08:43

Christ Baz your making Dylan's replys look easy to read ;)

Having seen some early shots of the frame on other sites where I thought it looked OK, built up I think it looks fantastic <checks bank account>

:( no luck there then :(
Posted: 08/12/2006 09:39

Dear Santa.......
Posted: 08/12/2006 10:02


J D
Carbon off road ??? No thanks.
Posted: 08/12/2006 10:12

I've ridden quite a few carbon bikes quite a lot off road now. They've mostly been crashed and they've all been peppered with rocks. Nothing untoward has happened to any of them. The last bike I actually damaged with rock strikes beyond cosmetic scuffs was aluminium, and heavy aluminium at that. I'm not worried about it any more ;-)
Posted: 08/12/2006 10:37

but think of the scratches!

would make me cry i tell ya
Posted: 08/12/2006 10:45

All bikes get scratched if you actually ride them :-)

There's always frame saver tape.
Posted: 08/12/2006 11:22

I quite like the look of it, its a blurry/nomaddy/intense kind of look - too expensive for me sadly.

I am going to need a lottery ticket, some premium bonds, a couple of hours and some disposable cash in a casino and a dark alley in a wealthy part of town. One of them should come up trumps!
Posted: 08/12/2006 11:47


J D
Given the choice i would sooner have cosmetic scratches on a metal frame than carbon.

and whilst there is still choice id chose metal over carbon for off road applications everytime.*


(*unless spesh bring in the carbon s-works tricross frame for next year when i'm ready to by a new cx frame ;¬)
Posted: 08/12/2006 12:04

Given the choice i would sooner have cosmetic scratches on a metal frame than carbon.

By definition, cosmetic scratches don't matter. If they do affect the frame, they're not cosmetic :-)


Posted: 08/12/2006 12:14

Please let my numbers come up!!!!

Scratches wouldn't bother me at all-if you have a high-end frame would you not take it out??

If so pop into Halfords and but a £99 special.
Posted: 08/12/2006 12:52

I wouldn't like to carry it for any length of time up somewhere like High Street in the Lakes, but it looks pretty good.
Posted: 08/12/2006 13:18

I think that's a beautiful bike, if I had that kinda money to spend on a bike that'd never see the race course it'd be hard to beat!

Incidentally, like Mike, I've ridden carbon frames off road for years, and never had any problems, had some serious chain suck and all sorts of crashes and high speed meetings with rocks/trees/other riders with no negative effects!
Posted: 08/12/2006 13:51

Very pretty. Bikes like the Nomad have got my eyes used to rounded bikes like the Sierra got my eyes used to rounded cars. Tone the look down a bit and it looks just right.

You'd get on much better riding with flat pedals judging by that photo Mike. Unclipped spuds are awful. ;-)
Posted: 08/12/2006 14:02

It's not me. I'm the one the other side of the camera ;-)
Posted: 08/12/2006 14:28

Ugly????!?!? I think it's eye wateringly beautiful, in an organic way.

I could have been in the frame for a new bike next year as I've been promised a decent Christmas bonus, but then I made the stupid decision to get the wife pregnant ;P
Posted: 08/12/2006 15:28

If it had Marin written on the downtube people would probably slate it.
Its not pretty, nor it is ugly per se, just expensive and exclusive. Most people idea of a beautiful bike appears to stretch no further than the brand name.......
Posted: 08/12/2006 18:52

Ibis is a chain of samey hotels and Mojo has something to do with Austin Powers. Even if it had Scott written on it I have to admit to finding it esthetically pleasing.
Posted: 08/12/2006 19:04

aesthetically
Posted: 08/12/2006 19:23

OK it's a typo but as there's nothing else in there to indicate it's not American English you're being overly picky. However 'I' should be 'I'd'.
Posted: 08/12/2006 19:27

when i first saw the mojo i thought what an ugly bike, now as time goes by i've started to really like it.
Posted: 08/12/2006 20:04

If I lost my mojo, at least 500 girls would kill themselves!
Posted: 08/12/2006 21:06


pb2
If I lost my mojo, at least 500 girls would kill themselves!

Yeah right, only in your dreams, only in your wildest dreams ;-)
Posted: 11/12/2006 12:16

pmsl @ Flash!!!!



I like it btw!
Posted: 11/12/2006 12:20

Well I've found mine to be a bit dull, to be honest...
More words, after a few more rides on, you know... the other place... :-)
Posted: 15/12/2006 01:10

#pours boiling oil over ramparts#

Posted: 15/12/2006 07:42

The frame looks very nice and I wouldn't hide the carbon fibre look under any paint job, they're too beautiful und you won't see scratches too well.
However I don't like the cable routing on top of the top tube! That's bound to leave scratches just as the too narrow chainstays will. At that price it's details like those that get you pis... after a year or two. Aluminium you can get repainted if it's really bad but cf???
I don't think having to change the whole linkage is a good idea either: I just don't believe the parts will be reasonably priced-just consider the frame price- and they know you'll NEED the bearings replaced.
Other than that-really nice bike, I guess.
Posted: 11/02/2007 12:16

Just read the comments about cosmetic scratches, by definition, not being critical to a frame.

Well, the problem you can have with carbon is something called Barely Visible Impact Damage. This term is pretty self explanatory and can mean that the Carbon is critically damaged even though on outward appearance it looks like nothing serious.

I have never seen this matter addressed in anyway by the bike companies. I can see road bikes madde from carbon being ok, as unless they are crashed they should be ok.
However, mountain bikes, by nature of their intended usage are more prone to impacts - from stones, chain slap, and crashes.

Anyone got any views on this?
Posted: 11/02/2007 17:52

Talkback: Ibis Mojo

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Hot threads