Bike Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Bike Reviews

Norco Rampage

A grand's worth of Canuckian "Shore Hardtail" tested


Posted: 15 September 2005
by Mike Davis

norco05_rampage_top_sml (43K)
  • Norco Rampage
  • £1,049
  • Monster freeride hardtail
  • 150mm fork, 150mm rear hub

Pushed for time? Skip straight to the verdict.

There's a definite trend amongst long-time mountain bikers to try something a bit different, stretch themselves a bit, push the envelope, even. We know plenty of riders who've migrated from the hills and the singletrack into the woods, the drops and the North Shore constructions. If you're going to have a stab at that sort of malarkey then it's likely that your lightweight trail bike isn't going to hack it. Or it might unless you get it wrong, and let's face it, you will at some point get it wrong.

Which is where bikes like Norco's Rampage come in. It's designed specifically for, well, riding off things. Norco is a Canadian brand, and apparently the Canadians invented riding off things, so the heritage is there. The Rampage is second-to-top in Norco's "Shore Hardtail" line-up, with just the frankly preposterous 170mm-forked Torrent above it.

norco05_rampage_side_sml (11K)

Sideways glance

norco05_rampage_head_sml (14K)

File under "burly"

norco05_rampage_fork_sml (12K)

150mm Z1 FR2 fork, 2.5in Kenda tyres

norco05_rampage_yoke_sml (20K)

Hewn from solid metal

norco05_rampage_brake_sml (14K)

Stop on a dime (or the equivalent in your local currency)

Frame

The most cursory of glances at the Rampage frame reveals Norco's design philosophy. The two tenets of frame construction over at Norco appear to be "Make it small" and "Make it strong", with the latter backed up with the handy rule of thumb, "If in doubt, add more metal".

Make no mistake, this is a seriously burly bit of kit. Aluminium doesn't weigh very much, and this is a heavy bike, so you know there's a hell of a lot of metal in it. It's not hard to see where it is, either. The flared octagonal down tube starts out massive at the bottom and gets bigger at the top, where it meets a big, thick head tube and a top tube that in this context looks fairly slim but is in fact pretty big. Oh, and there's a gusset at the head/down tube junction.

The back end is similarly chunky. The chainstay yoke behind the bottom bracket is made up of two lengths of rectangular bar stock. No fancy machining, hollow forgings or anything here - just solid metal. The chainstays are deep vertically, the seatstays have a square cross-section and the dropouts are hefty forged items.

Unusually for a hardtail, the Rampage (and its Torrent brother) runs a 150mm wide rear hub with a solid 12mm axle. This has a number of advantages - the wider hub means a less-dished and hence stronger rear wheel, and you'll have to try very hard indeed to bend a 12mm axle.

Not all "ickle jumpy bikes" are available in a choice of sizes, but the Rampage can be had in S, M or L versions. They're all very low-slung - the M shown here measures 16.5in centre-to-top - but actually quite long. The effective top tube on the M is just over 23in. Of course, effective top tube is all-but irrelevant on a bike like this on which you're rarely going to be sitting down, but it comes with a proper length seatpost so you can actually get the seat up to pedal it, and it almost feels like a normal bike then.

Components

You'd expect this sort of bike to come with a selection of beefy parts, and the Rampage doesn't disappoint. It's immediately obvious that Norco has put most of its money into the fundamentals and saved on the stuff that's likely to wear out or break anyway. You get an 8spd transmission with a low-rent HG30 cassette and Alivio shifters. The spec list says there's an XT rear mech but the test bike came with an LX - no problems there, whatever it is it'll probably come off the first time you muff that skinny line and LX is cheaper to replace. The Alivio front mech is an actually rather nasty pressed-steel device, but it works, shifting competently between the two rings on the Truvativ Hussefelt chainset. ISIS bottom brackets are somewhat out of favour these days, but on a bike like this axle strength and secure cranks are a higher priority than bearing life so we'll let it off.

It's the rest of the gear that really makes this bike what it is, with the key element being the 150mm travel Marzocchi Z1 FR2 fork. This is pretty much the same as the Z1 FR1 that we tested and liked earlier in the year, only without the ETA travel lockdown feature. You're highly unlikely to ride this bike up anything that needs a fork lockdown, and we didn't miss it. The wheels spin on unbranded hubs but feature guttering-width Sun Singletrack rims and DT Swiss spokes. Tyres are a 2.5in Kenda Blue Groove/Nevegal combination, and they come up big.

Bar, stem and saddle are all from Titec. We were pleased to see a low-rise El Norte bar - the front of this bike is pretty high up already, there's no need to slap a 2in riser on there too. Bringing it all to a halt are Hayes HFX-9 brakes, with 8in rotors at both ends. Do you need an 8in rotor on the back of a hardtail? Almost certainly not, but it certainly looks the part, and on the sort of trails this bike relishes we'll take all the help we can get.

It's a pretty solid spec where it matters. If this was our bike we'd swap the rear mech for a less vulnerable short cage on and shorten the chain a lot - it slaps about quite a bit. Other than that and the ISIS BB, no complaints really.

Ride

The Rampage is one of those bikes that rides exactly how you expect it to. The high front and tiny frame make it feel quite odd on level ground, but point it downhill and it all makes a lot of sense. The steeper it gets, the better the Rampage likes it. You can ride down almost anything on this - even though the frame's not all that short, the stem is and the back's so low that you can hang way off the back, hide behind the big fork and just aim for the bottom.

On less vertiginous trails you'll need to work the front end to get round corners at any sort of pace - ride it like most regular bikes and the front'll be skipping across the trail in no time. Haul yourself up the front, push the wheel into the corner and it's just fine. There's tons of grip from the Kenda tyres once you've got the weight distribution right.

Drops are probably this bike's very favourite thing, though. The hefty wheels make it stable in the air, you've got so much room at the back that you can take full advantage of your long-travel legs and the fork's there to save you from slightly wonky landings. Unless you're completely suicidal, the limiting factor is not the bike, it's the pilot.

Despite the presence of a granny ring and a seat that'll reach pedalling altitude, this isn't really a bike for riding around on - you can achieve a fairly sensible pedalling position but the short stem and slack angles will work against you on hills, and the weight'll have you in the granny ring earlier than most. But that's not really what the Rampage is for. If you feel compelled to push your limits and want a bike that won't let you down, you won't be disappointed.

Tough as the most elderly of old boots, braver than you are, good bits where it counts

Possibly more bike than you need, somewhat single-minded, slightly low-rent transmission


Verdict

Most bikes we look at are, to a greater or lesser extent, all-rounders - we don't get many that are very good at one thing and not really terribly good at anything else. The Rampage is really quite single-minded, although it's pedallable enough to take on a fire-road cruise to the top of something ludicrous to ride down. One thing's for sure, though - it'll tackle anything you dare to try and you won't break it.


Performance Value Overall


Previous article Previous article:
Riding hot and cold
Next article:Next article
Kona and On-One bikes stolen

Discuss this story

I suspect not Hard asnails?
Posted: 15/09/2005 15:15

my cat's called nails, and having just prodded him, I find that nails is in fact quite squishy











IGMC
Posted: 15/09/2005 17:51

id hazzard a guess that it handled similar to my banshee due to the chunkiness of it.

i went from a XC frame to the banshee and the first thing i noticed was that it moved when and where you wanted it to straight away. also on landing a jump or drop of sorts you knew exactly when you had landed and it felt solid and stable on doing so.

im not the most graceful rider in the world so this rigidness suits me just fine.
Posted: 15/09/2005 17:56

Much the same with my old Kona Stuff, it was a cast iron whore to ride up and loved it going down and off things..... aaah memories.....
Posted: 15/09/2005 19:29

150mm rear hub - please take note all other manufacturers who have yet to see sense.
Posted: 15/09/2005 20:06

The hooge tires take the edge off it a bit, and obviously you never sit down so it doesn't pound your backside ;-) You certainly know whether you've landed smoothly or not, though. Although the long-cage mech and over-long chain provide ample auditory clues by themselves...
Posted: 15/09/2005 20:23

Oh and I've got the same 8 inch Hayes brake on the the back of my hard knock hardtail and ..............my FS XC bike. Why make do with anything smaller?
Posted: 15/09/2005 20:54


dzm
"The effective top tube on the M is just over 23in. Of course, effective top tube is all-but irrelevant on a bike like this on which you're rarely going to be sitting down"

Have you ever tried dirt-jumping with a 23" + top tube? Or tried to pull up on a low-speed drop? Or manual? I'd say effective top tube length was pretty important on a bike like this.
Posted: 16/09/2005 11:01

Nope. Front-centre is important.
Posted: 16/09/2005 11:28


dzm
True, but a 27.1" front centre on a medium, that's long.
Posted: 16/09/2005 11:49

It seems to measure 26.5 on this one, but yes, it's fairly long. The numbers kind of hide the story, though - part of the reason the FC is long is because of the big fork. The actual BB/handlebar relationship isn't what you might think from looking at the numbers, and your weight distribution is distinctly rearward.
Posted: 16/09/2005 12:07

its not a dirt jump bike.

maybe thats why its not a pefect jump geometry.

its being marketed as a "free ride" frame so surely the longer top tube makes it a bit easier to handle on the climbs and down hills.
Posted: 16/09/2005 13:34


dzm
"bit easier to handle on the climbs"

That'll be that uphill freeriding i've been reading about. The next big thing apparently
Posted: 16/09/2005 15:13

It is designed to be at least vaguely able to climb. Given that its natural environment is a hulking great wooded mountainside with a fireroad that winds its way to the top and a stupidly steep technical trail going back down again, it's the right shape IMO.
Posted: 16/09/2005 15:16

well my definition of free riding might be different than yours dzm, but as far as im concerned freeride means a little bit of this and a little bit of that.

you need to climb to the top of the hill to get down it.

unless your talking about that lazy fat arsed version of freeriding which has been hijacked by the media over the last few years.


Posted: 16/09/2005 15:22

I ride a Norco sasquatch and it is amazing - same frame as the rampage and can vouch for its ability - I can take anything, way more than I can throw at it. I can keep up with big full sussers in the downs and actually pedal up - albeit getting a bit knackered in the process (35lbs is a lot for an HT).

I use this bike for everything (except road miles where I use the road bike) it is 10lbs heavier than my last HT but inpires a lot of confidence and I know it wont break.

The finishing kit is poor though - I found that cheap hubs meant a whole new wheelset in a few months, ISIS BB - forget it, 2 of these in 6 months and I went for a shimano saint.

I would say better to buy the torrent frameset (can you still do this?) and spec it with a tough wheelset, avid brakes and some shimano saint kit - it will last forever!
Posted: 16/09/2005 20:31

hmm, it almost sounds like a challenge
Posted: 16/09/2005 20:37

I've got one of these sitting in a box back in New Zealand at present. The few chances I got to ride it back in the Uk it was pretty awesome. I look forward to throwing it off some NZ cliffs.

As for me, I am sweating my Ar$e off in Kolcuta, India at present. I will have to endure the beaches of South East Asia before I will get to ride my bikes again.

The horror, the horror...
Posted: 17/09/2005 16:16

howdo mark?
Posted: 17/09/2005 16:58

hello mark. long time no hear. well, i suppose your travelling about a bit! i'm off to kiwi in feb for 5 weeks or so : ) yey.
Posted: 17/09/2005 18:54

Hey Guys,

Things are good. I am about 5 months into my round the world trip and have just over a week left in India. Damn it is hot here.

Have already been down through Africa and across South America. I got to Mtb with Zebras and Antelope in Kenya, and over, 4000 meters in Herez, Peru. Unfortunately to a rather bad sandboarding Incident I missed what same say is the longest down hill in the world just outside of La Paz, Bolivia (bugger), but I am lucky to still be walking so can't complain.

Next it is off to South East Asia and back in NZ in time for Xmas.

Hungry Monkey, look me up if you are Wellington when you are over and we can go riding :-)

Cheers




Posted: 18/09/2005 12:24

Talkback: Norco Rampage

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: