Bike Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Bike Reviews

SRAM X.7 trigger shifters

SRAM's new mid-range shifters and rear mech tested


Posted: 28 October 2003
by Mike Davis

sram_x7_trigger1_sml (7K)
Bigger pic
sram_x7_trigger2_sml (7K)
Bigger pic
sram_x7_mech_sml (14K)
Bigger pic
  • SRAM X.7 shifters/mech
  • Rear mech £44.99; shifters £45.99
  • Fisher Outdoor
  • 01727 798345

For years and years, mountain bikers have had a choice of essentially two shifting systems. In the red corner, there was Shimano's RapidFire+, an underbar unit with a thumb lever to downshift and an index finger trigger to upshift. In the blue corner, SRAM's Gripshift featuring a rotating grip on the bars. They're fundamentally different designs and, as is so often the way with fundamental differences, split opinions quite neatly. Either you were a Gripshift person or an RF+ person...

Now it's all got a bit more varied. Shimano launched its road-inspired Dual Control system with 2003's XTR group, using the brake lever blade swinging up and down to drive the shifting. DC features on XT for 2004 and we'd expect it to trickle down to the lower groups as the years go by. Which means that underbar triggers are a little out of favour with the big S.

In a timely move, though, SRAM has released its own triggers. They had a go a couple of years back with the almost-mythical Gemini shifter which never really reached the market. The new Impulse shifters are completely redesigned and reengineered and have pretty much nothing in common with the Gemini except the basic ergonomics.

We've never been Gripshift fans, preferring RF+'s clicky trigger action. But it's not perfect. If, like us, you favour braking with your index finger you have to keep moving said digit between brake lever and upshift trigger. And it's also patented, so no-one else could make shifters like that anyway. SRAM neatly sidestep both these issues by making the upshift trigger move vertically and designed to be hit by your thumb.

We don't mind admitting that this felt weird at first. Moving your thumb around the downshift lever to reach the upshift trigger initially feels a bit unwieldy. But one of the good things about these shifters is that they're very adjustable. The gear indicator is ingeniously built into the shifter clamp and you've got a lot of freedom to move the units around and along the bars to get a position you like.

It wasn't long before we really got into Impulse shifting. We love being able to cover the brake and be able to shift either way while maintaining a good grip on the bars at all times. The upshift trigger can be positioned to lie exactly above where your thumb naturally sits and it takes the merest of upwards thumb flicks to get a higher gear (or lower at the front...).

The X.7 units are designed to work with SRAM's X.7 ESP rear mech, with a 1:1 actuation ratio. SRAM originally came up with this to counter Gripshift's often finicky behaviour with mucky cables, but it's just as valid with triggers. The new mech has a lot more metal in it, while the direct cable routing and 1:1 ratio keep the action impressively light and snappy. The shifters themselves have quite a bit of plastic in them but feel reassuringly solid.

SRAM also offer a higher-spec X.9 variant, plus Attack and Rocket versions to work with Shimano derailleurs. All the versions are nine-speed only.


Verdict
We love these. For the first few rides we were all over the place, trying to push the trigger back with our finger and stuff. But now the shifting action feels like the most natural thing in the world. With Shimano backing Dual Control, anyone looking for an alternative should try these - for our money SRAM's trigger offering is the best non-integrated shifting solution out there.

PERFORMANCE
VALUE
OVERALL

Previous article Previous article:
Laggan bike trails move a step closer
Next article:Next article
Specialized P3 winner!

Discuss this story

For the first time iin my life, i'm actually considering a SRAM drivetrain
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:08

You know it makes sense!
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:17

Ah, but why?
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:19

Been using the Attack Trigger shifters for several months now & I agree with everything the BM review says.

They are indeed superb and there's no way I'll be going back to Shimano, esp. not their combined brake-shifter thingys!
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:29

But when are they going to release a front mech?

(they've got to be designing one at the moment)
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:43

do it, kato!!

i just bought a 9.0 cassette and pc99 chain and my shifting has never been smoother!!
X.O rear mech next... mmmm tasty!
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:53

Absolutely... I don't think Shimano shoul ddecide how we are all going to change gears in the future. Dual Control may look funky but I for one an not keen. Like Paul, I hope they make a front mech soon so I can wave bye bye to my old XT drivetrain. Has anyone tried the X.9 yet, and what about X.0? Worth the £150 asking price?
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:55

i really don't liek the look of the shimano pods.

they look....... awful! basically
Posted: 28/10/2003 13:57

Has anyone tried both X7 and X9, I want to know if the X9 is worth the extra moolah, or if I should continue to be a cheap barstard and run the 7's.
Posted: 28/10/2003 14:27

"Absolutely... I don't think Shimano shoul ddecide how we are all going to change gears in the future."

I think it's unfair to suggest that Shimano force the market. I should imagine that they, like anyone in business, markets the products that they believeare most likely to serve the needs of the current market.

Non-integrated shifters at XT and XTR level are still available, indeed they're specced on some 2004 bikes including the Marin Mount Vision. As long as people buy them Shimano will make and market them.

"there's no way I'll be going back to Shimano, esp. not their combined brake-shifter thingys"

I for one am happy to stand up for integrated shifting - I think it's a real step forward for cross country riders. Anyone who's not tried them should.
Posted: 28/10/2003 15:30

I'm with Cullen on this one.
I've been using the Dual control levers for almost a year now and they're the best shifters I've used; and that includes RF+ and Gripshift.
You can downshift from the bar end while standing on the pedals.
Can't do that with either GS or RF+.

I tried the new SRAM's as well but did'nt like the thumb doing all the work. With my smaller hands the solution just did'nt work for me.

Way I see, i have more choice with Shimano so I'll be sticking to their product line for the foreseeable future.
Posted: 28/10/2003 15:45

If Shimano aren't trying to decide how we operate the gears on our bikes, why are they always slapping injunctions on SRAM to prevent them selling or even showing their products? The recent show in Germany is just one example.

I can't see the big S retaining RF's when most of it's marketing power is going behind DC. If this is the case, why would they prevent a company like SRAM providing a product that fills a hole they have left open?

I currently use XT RF shifters and they are fine, but if big S do drop RF's from their product range I will change to SRAM as I've been used to the same method of changing gears for years now and the X.7 shifters seems to be more akin to what I'm used to.

Like everything... it's down to personal taste. If you like DC great. If you don't try something else (is Shimano will let you).
Posted: 28/10/2003 15:56

Shimano are pretty much obliged to take legal action against anyone they think is infringing their patents. They risk losing patent protection if they don't.

I doubt RF+ will disappear for a good few years yet.
Posted: 28/10/2003 15:59

They slap injunctions on SRAm because SRAM are infinging on Shimano's intellectual property. Asmike has explained, if they fail to do so, it sets a precedant and they loose patent protection.

way I see it, SRAM feels the 'differences' on their X-shifters are significant enough to be outside the Shaimno patents. I'm not convinced. If Shimano's action goes forward it will most likely be upheld in any other court as the German patent process is farmore stringent then anywhere else.
Win your case in Germany and then it's easy to win in other countries.

I think SRAM have blundered this one.
What they should have done is designed a underbar shifter with a single paddle. That would be novel and outside Shimano's patent.

Also as Mike has stated, I doubt RF+ will disappear completely this decade. There are too many systems out there which they need to carry spares for.
Simply because something is no longer produced does not mean that there is no stock pile of spares.
Posted: 28/10/2003 16:37

Uh oh... I can see I'm on a highway to hell on this one. I'd just like to see the little guy win occasionally especially as SRAM are providing what appears to be a real alternative to the big S.

I like the idea of a single paddle BTW...
Posted: 28/10/2003 16:56

I'm very tempted to try them. Do they work with the X0 rear mech?
Posted: 28/10/2003 17:12

Fair play. SRAM are a pretty big company mind, that in itself shows the scale of Shimano's success in the mtb market.
Posted: 28/10/2003 17:19

Anne... do you have an X.0 rear mech?
Posted: 28/10/2003 17:25

Yes, the shifters will work with an X.0 mech.
Posted: 28/10/2003 17:58

The triggers should work with pretty much any 9 speed Sram Mech

I have been using Sram X-7 triggers plus an X-9 rear mech since July this year and they have been faultless my only niggle is that i cant adjust the chainline on the fly on the front mech like i could with my old 9.0 Half Pipes

The quality is fantastic X-7 gives you the bulid quality of XT with an LX price tag
Posted: 28/10/2003 18:21

err... basic question from me...

I'm runing hope minis...bigS deore RF+...

I know I'll need rear mech / chain / cassete upgrade in the next 3 months - cos it's winter in the peak and that's what it's like with the mud and peat abuse...

as far as I can see new XT means i cant use new system with existing brakes...i luv my minis and have thought about just getting "old" XT upgrades to shifters / mech / cassette etc...

if I'm right surely everyone else is thinking the same who doesnt use bigS discs???

or have totally missed the point??

sorry for the ignorance.
Posted: 28/10/2003 18:51

Hope have a Shimano compatable disc set on the way apparently, uses mineral oil instead of Dot fluid.
Posted: 28/10/2003 19:16

I picked up X-9 shifters and XO rear mech outside the UK for the UK rrp price of the mech alone. I posted review of both at the w/e, but that for the shifters has yet to be posted....
I agree with all the X-7 review says - but X-9 feels even better. Rear mech shifting is brilliant - fast, smooth and sooo positive. Shifting of LX front mech is also much improved.
Took very little time to get used to the different action, and I'm still experimenting with positioning. But it is still way ahead of RF+. No going back for me!
Posted: 28/10/2003 20:13

No I don't have an X0 mech but I'd like to.
Posted: 28/10/2003 20:14

The trick with X.0 is not the rear mech, it's the shifters.
they have a return srping which forces the cable through faster on upshifts to allow the cable to provide control to the derailleur. The X.0 rear is waste of money IMO when the x.9 is just as good and only slightly heavier.

Jon,
the new mono Mini,it is believed, will have a mineral oil version as well which willbe usable with Dual Control shifter /brake pods.
Naturally this means a different version of the Mono Mini becauseit will have to be designed to work with the Shimano Lever side piston
Posted: 29/10/2003 00:06

thanks,
seems to me X. sram of some type is the way to go.... i presume proces are the same / comparable to XT....


Posted: 29/10/2003 10:35

It's just a shame they don't make a front mech, crankset or decent brakes.
Posted: 29/10/2003 19:52

they do make forks though......
Posted: 29/10/2003 21:23

not very good ones though ;-)
Posted: 29/10/2003 22:50

Quite frankly why does anyone care whether they make a front mech? Especially when there's the magic of Deores to fit almost all size seattubes and cable pull directions. How does that fit with the "Shimano market domination theory"?

Posted: 30/10/2003 08:44

Wasn't there talk of Hope launching a Shimano mineral oil powered Mini that could be used with DC?
I've used DC and it's a great way to shift, but rapid fire, I find, is better because it takes less of a push to get the gears to shift- with DC I was ushing the lever a lot further down than my fingers could take.
I'll be sticking with rapid fire because I like my Hopes and I won't get a new XT or XTR mech because Rapid Rise just confuses me. But that doesn't mean I'll opt for Sram- I'll get old XT or XTR if it's still about because I like having a whole drivetrain (though mine is currently LX/XT) from one company.
And as for Sram chains, I used a PC48 on my 7spd race bike and the chain suck has left huge gouges- never happened with Shimano.
I'll still go for something better than PC48 though for the powerlink.
Posted: 30/10/2003 09:25

There was talk of a mineral oil Hope, yes. About three posts ago, in fact ;-)

It would give rise to some interesting product liability issues, but the motorbike industry appears to manage to successfully sell mix-n-match lever/caliper combinations so I don't see why it won't work here.
Posted: 30/10/2003 09:28

The x-9 shifters sound pretty good and are available for both sram and shimano mechs. so... what are the opinions on the mech then? Are XTR better than say the ESP-9.0?
Posted: 30/10/2003 09:29

There could well be an X series front mech on the way SRAM are rushing it through testing now, but are staying tight lipped about it at the moment
Posted: 30/10/2003 09:46

We've also been trying the Attack trigger shifters on an XT mech and to be honest it's every bit as good as the ESP combo. If you've already got Shimano stuff but want new shifters I'd stick with the Shimano mech. If you're buying the lot from scratch then it comes down to looks and preferred corporation ;-)
Posted: 30/10/2003 10:33

I've used both SRAM 9.0SL and now XTR and I find the XTR to be slightly sower but more accurate on upshifts. Downshifts on the XTR low Normal are substantially better and are executed with the same precision regardless of chain tension. For racing thats what I need. A gear change system that you can shift while standing or seated, while on the barends or flat bar. XTR gives me that so I choose it over SRAM.

Both systems have quality shifting. It all boils down to how you want it too compliment your needs
Posted: 30/10/2003 11:08

Thanks Tim...

Posted: 30/10/2003 12:15

Tim XC Rider,

The XO RD Spring is 30% stronger than the others (I just spoke to SRAM).
Posted: 30/10/2003 12:19

What does 1:1 actuation ratio mean?...sorry
Posted: 30/10/2003 12:53

Ollie,

yes it's 30% stronger but thats 30% more effort you have to use to downshift.
To me upshifting is never a problem, it's on the downshifts were you loose a race hence I prefer Low Normal.
Also the difference in shift quality is determined by a lot more than how powerful the return spring is.
X.0 is smooth and accurate because the top pulley runs a constant distance from teh cassette sprockets in all gears.
It's mor ethe geometry of the mech that makes it as good as it is. The stiffer return spring provides the 'race feel'

With the XTR the top pulley is a floating pulley so it achieves a similar result to X.0 but goes about it differently

Hypo,
1:1 AR means that for every millimeter teh derailleur moves laterally the cable moves 1 mm.


Posted: 30/10/2003 14:04

See more comments...
Talkback: SRAM X.7 trigger shifters

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: