Monday 23 November 2009 | Personalise | Help  
 FORUM
Discussions by:   Latest Posts | New Discussions | Hot Threads | Forum Topics
 Search forum: 
Shimano SLX: First look
Related article
Shimano SLX: First look
Yes, it's 2009 already. Shimano repositions LX, drops Hone and replaces both with the all-new SLX mid-range group - and here it is

1 to 20 of 25 messages. Page: 1  2  To post a reply you need to be a member - Join now.
Show/hide user stats
It's interesting that Dual Control and Rapid Rise are completely missing from SLX. It's nice to know that Shimano will listen to feedback and have moved away from their original "this is the future, get used to it" line.
Show/hide user stats
Well they didnt have much choice, i know after owning a single bike with rapid rise my next bike would've been equipped with Sram had shimano not dropped the stupid idea.
This member’s stats are private

So LX is becoming a Touring groupset?

*worries that Ramascese will sprout Brookes saddle and panniers..*

Show/hide user stats
No, LX becoming Trekking is more to do with those high end Euro 'fitness' type bikes with flat bars.  They're massive on the continent, and the 2008 Deore XT had a specific sub-group of components aimed at that market.  I guess Deore LX is simply following that lead, with SLX giving a bit more of a dilineation between the types of use.
Show/hide user stats
But I like rapid rise, got it on both bikes now.  Prefer when you need to shift whilst climbing.
Show/hide user stats
It's still on XT if you don't want a Shadow mech. SLX will be Shadow-only.
Show/hide user stats
Oh good, I don't think my tiny brain would cope with having to get used to back to front shifting...

Rapid rise is illogical as it realies purely on the spring in the mech to bring it up to larger gears,  where as normal rise the cable pulls it there,  and a lesser spring is required to drop down the block.

Swapping from 1 to the other frequently would just be insane to!!

Show/hide user stats

Rapid rise is illogical as it realies purely on the spring in the mech to bring it up to larger gears,  where as normal rise the cable pulls it there,  and a lesser spring is required to drop down the block.

Neither is really any more logical than the other, it's just what you're used to. Low normal is pretty damn ace for downshifts on climbs, but not so ace that I rushed out and adopted it wholesale  

Swapping from 1 to the other frequently would just be insane to!!

I have one low-normal bike, it catches me out the first few shifts but you get used to it. It's not really any worse than switching between SRAM and Shimano triggers, or MTB to road STI or something.  

I've been riding SRAM attacks for ages,  went back to deore on the HT,  really couldn't get used to the shifting even after 3 or 4 rides.

Show/hide user stats
As with anything, if you switch more frequently you acclimatise quicker. I seem to end up with different shifters nearly every ride
This member’s stats are private
Same here, four bikes with different shifters, they all work well.
Edited: 18/02/08 16:43
Show/hide user stats

I've one bike with low-normal dual controls and with with high-normal triggers.  I don't find it particularly tricky switching between then,

I kind of like the angular look of the new group anyway, looks smart 

This member’s stats are private
Looks a bit robocop to me.

Makes me want to hold off on getting XT servo waves and Shadow mech,  I'll wait and get the cheaper LX version   sorted!!

Roled into Deore for 2010 I bet,  hmmmm Deore !!

Show/hide user stats
Overall, looks cool, but I'm very keen on dual control.

The pads look really inaccessible: they're deeply recessed so that they look difficult to get at.
Show/hide user stats
I think it was a need to redifine the groupset as I think most people would always spend the extra few pounds and go with XT or save the few pounds and go Deore. I have also heard this is going to replace the Hone groupset, don't know how true that is though.

From the news article I think it said Hone is being dropped.

Yeah it's a more all mountain ( atleast in looks ) than XC chainset which does make it a seperate product not a slightly heavier/cheaper product which is a good thing.

Show/hide user stats
On current bikes I've got down tube, sti road, bar end, rapid fire, rapid fire dual release, SRAM triggers, grip shift and thumbies. :-/
Show/hide user stats

I like the angular look too, the chainset and brake levers make me wanna buy them on looks alone!

Agreed on the shifter thing, I have five bikes four of which with different shifters and have no problem, two with lx shifters, one with sram gripshift, one with indexed rotary thumb shifters (the old above bar type that came after friction jobbies) and one with ye-olde non-indexed rotary thumb friction shifters.

However the issue of gears going in the opposite direction is a bit different, after years of doing it the conventional way, even if I got accustomed to it, when under pressure on a stiff climb, fast descent, or undulating trail where you're constantly up and down the gears I'd tend to forget, with obvious consequences!

 

Page: 1  2  


Change stats view
Make external bookmarkAdd to My Bookmarks

« Previous thread   -   Next thread »
Home > Forum > Kit forumForum jump  
Support our sponsors
 

Support our sponsors

Offers, Competitions and Promotions
win free stuff with rcuk

Squirt Competition
Win 1 of 50 bottles of SQUIRT - Long lasting Dry Lube
Ticket2RideBC Adventures
Advertorial: Ticket2RideBC specialises in guided mountain bike adventures
British Heart Foundation
Advertorial: Get cycling for the BHF and raise vital money