 "Skidmark"??? 
|
 |
 Don't like it.
|
|
 looks like it hit every branch on the way out of the ugly tree, much prefer the look of the old one
|
|
Keep your childish comments in the soapbox please.
|
|
 keep yourself in your caravan.
|
|
I don't like it.
|
|
I think it looks good - I might buy one
|
|
 Bloody beautiful
|
|
Oooooooh Karlos. Temper, temper. "Childish comments"? Funny, but "Dirty Karlos" doesn't seem the most, er, grown up of monikers...
|
|
 It's alright, but how does it ride, the old LT wasn't actually supposed to be that good when considered against the competition.
|
|
Oooooooh Karlos. Temper, temper. "Childish comments"? Funny, but "Dirty Karlos" doesn't seem the most, er, grown up of monikers... Tongue in cheek Sir, tongue in cheek. 
|
|
Feltching again?
|
|
 I like that actually, which is unusual for me as I'm not a big SC fan. Maybe it's because it looks like a Yeti 
|
|
I think it actually looks "OK"... however, my big issue is why another frame that essentially does the same/similar job to the Heckler and Nomad... all 6in"ish" travel frames, and I guess all around the 6.5lb weight mark.... i know two are linkage, and one single pivot.. but hey ho!... in my eyes, there's a gapping hole in the range.... there are the superlight and Blur XC, mega-light frames around the 100mm travel mark..... i would have thought competition to the 120mm/130mm travel bikes (ala Fisher Hifi, Trek Fuel, trance X), in a custom build trickier flavour would be more appropriate (in a 5.75 - 6lb frame weight).
|
|
 Don't like it  It looks dated already.
|
|
 They've given it a slightly nomad-ish shoulder. Which still looks crap. Shame, probably a cracking frame, but if i dont like the looks i wont buy it.
|
| Edited: 26/02/08 23:46 |
 Magazine testers didn't like it either when they rode it at Afan. But I only spoke to 2 of them. ( the only 2 that were testing it that day) Steeper head tube angle seemed to be their main complaint.
|
| Edited: 27/02/08 03:03 |
 I like the looks and can't see what's wrong with a 69° head angle given the bikes intended use. In fact it was looking great till I got to the end and realized that a Nicolai Helius CC costs about the same.
|
|
Thats true I thought the price a little excessive - you can nearly get a fully built heckler for the price of the anodised Blur LT frame (would still like one...)
|
|
A bike with 140 mm rear and 160mm front for the UK, come to think about it anywhere unless your into downhilling whats the need ? It also looks crap which isnt helped by photographing against a black background, half the shock has disapeared.
|
|
