Sunday 22 November 2009 | Personalise | Help  
 FORUM REVIEWS
 
Related Categories:
Bikes \ Full Suspension

 FORUM
Discussions by:   Latest Posts | New Discussions | Hot Threads | Forum Topics
 Search forum: 
Santa Cruz BLUR!!!
MBR test
21 to 29 of 29 messages. Page: 1  2  To post a reply you need to be a member - Join now.
Show/hide user stats
Having just swapped from a pre-superlight Heckler to an Uzzi SL, my view would be that suspension performance wise the Uzzi beats the SC hands down. It climbs as well, but in a different way, but DH it's amazing, being more supple and without the braking induced stiffening of swing arm bikes.

If SC have managed to build a bike that works as well as the Intense, that doesn't bob, but is only 1/2 lb heavier than a superlight, then they've got a winner.

Maintenance of bearings is not a huge issue. It took me a bout 3 hrs to change all the bearings on the Intense (bought it s/h) Cost £35. The S/C took less time, but the bearings (2 rather than 8) cost me £28 - some weird american size. Friends with Uzzis reckon bearings last 18mths + (same as the SC).

Cost isn't that unreasonable either compared to Intense, Ellsworth, Titus etc, particulary given its cutting edge technology.

If I hadn't picked up the Uzzi cheap, I'd probably have one on order...


Show/hide user stats
Youch! I could imagine a lot of cursing was done that day...
Show/hide user stats
Breaking swingarms I mean, not changing bearings.
Show/hide user stats
Talking of bikes weighing more than they should, have you seen the review of the Titus in the new MBR? Apparently the boss of Titus was 'surprised' that the test bike weighed in at 27.5lbs, he said it should be nearer 24 with the quoted spec. How's that then?
Show/hide user stats
Witchcraft?

So has anyone ridden a Blur yet?
Show/hide user stats
I am constantly amazed at the way components are actually heavier than their quoted weight. Calibrated balances really aren't that hard to come by (although calibrated marketing departments may be ;-)

If the blur is only half a pound heavier than the SL then it should be possible to build a 25.5/26lb version without serious compromise for under £3K. However if you want things like Forx etc. then it will be harder to keep the weight down. But then the whole point is about ride, rather than weight, isn't it? Back in a circle again.
Show/hide user stats
The Blur is one or several on my list of possibles for 2003... but, I think I'm gonna wait for the Intense "Spider" VPP. Apperently they will be showcasing it at Interbike, with bikes ready early 2003. It looks soooo much better than the Blur & according to the blurb on it.. it's a lighter frame than the SC offering.
Show/hide user stats
Well I just bought a Spec Enduro, and yes I'd love a Blur/Spider, but for £599, you can't really argue.
I just hope it doesn't break, and if it does, take it back and get a 2003 one!

Oh, and I'm swapping it for my element, as I want true 4bar linkage design.
Show/hide user stats
Just been chatting to my friendly LBS. Managed to get a ride on one of the new VPP marins and was blown away so SC certainly have competition, especially given that the marins'll be half the price

 

Page: 1  2  


Change stats view
Make external bookmarkAdd to My Bookmarks

« Previous thread   -   Next thread »
Home > Forum > Kit forumForum jump  
Support our sponsors
 

Support our sponsors

Offers, Competitions and Promotions
win free stuff with rcuk

Squirt Competition
Win 1 of 50 bottles of SQUIRT - Long lasting Dry Lube
Ticket2RideBC Adventures
Advertorial: Ticket2RideBC specialises in guided mountain bike adventures
British Heart Foundation
Advertorial: Get cycling for the BHF and raise vital money