I need a new 9 speed chain for XC and previously had something like the SRAM PC89. It seems now whichever chain I start to look at has mixed reviews. SRAM which never seemed to have a problem now get slated in half the reviews, especially ones like the PC991 and hollow pin version which I was looking at. Then I looked at a KMC X9-SL and that gets mixed reviews. I'm under 12 stone so not a heavy bloke and it's going to be used first time in anger really across the whole of the South Downs Way hence my concern of reliability.
Its going to be going on a new XTR cassette so I wanted something suitably bling and had planned to avoid Shimano because of the special joining pin issue. Can KMC chains only be re-joined with their special links or can the pins be re-used?
I've used most brand of chains in the past and I've found Sram chains to be the most reliable! I use PC991 on all of my bikes and never have any probs with them. I never read the reviews tbh. Stick with what you know works best...
and for the shocker ... i run a pc48 sram chain on my SS which did 10 under the ben solo , did 700kms between that and 10 under kirroughtree then did 10 under kirroughtree ... im going to replace it now ...but at a cost of 8.99 or summat to replace it every 1000km is not really a hassle ....
I use KMC X9SLs on my Epic, they're quite noisy, and there's LOADS of 'play' in the chain, there are visible gaps between the rollers and the plates, more so than any other chain I've seen. But, they're damn light, they shift well, and I've never broken one!
IMO they last better, the drivetrain wears less and doesn't "wear in" to a single chain as much. You can also have the spare chain soaking in your solvent of choice, between rides, so a nice clean chain ready for your next ride.