|
|
 |
|
|
| Edited: 19/11/09 16:41 |
 Good, bloody slobs the lot of them!
|
 |
 Makes you proud to live in a place where what people (don't) learn in school, the lies they get told every time there's a commercial break and the calorie laden junk on the supermarket shelves means an lot end up like that. I hope the authorities had some other better reasons to take the kids away. Treat the cause not the symptoms - ban sugar!
|
 |
 Sew their mouth up!
|
 |
 Well that fat family don't look like they live in a des res suburb of Dundee, probably not too well off so how the the hell did the family afford to buy the amount of food required to get the children so fat in the first place? Send them all to fat camp.
|
 |
 I still blame the parents. If they could be bothered to by 'real' food & cook 'proper' meals instead of taking the easy processed shit/take-away route. And, no, diet coke does not negate the effects of a large meal in mcburgerwimpy. Eating all that cack can quickly lead to a reliance on excess salt/sugar/fat/E no's. It should be deemed as a form of abuse and parents need to be held to account.
|
 |
 Yes eating too much fat and crap coupled with no exercise,I bet they have X Boxs at home and sit playing those rather than doing anything physical. Perhaps instead of taxing fatty foods we'd be better off bringing in a law whereby anyone of a certain age who goes over a certain weight limit based on a percentage of body fat should be sent to a fat camp,a bit like a prison sentence but a sentence for being fat and lazy, term to be decided on how much they exceed their maximum allowance for body fat, levels to be pre-determined by the NHS. I can just see it now, some lard ass trying to do a chin up in camp and failing to haul their ass up with a drill instructor screaming 'get up there you fast b@st@ard!' Then don't let them out till they drop below the acceptable limit.
|
 |
 That'd cost lots more, lead to a load of human rights/abuse/injury claims and not change the behaviour that caused the excessive fat in the first place, so it would be the same people going back every few months/years dpeending on the frequency of checks. One other thing to remember is that being fat isn't a new phenomenon - if you're from an agricultural background in Ireland and presumably the UK too, a generation or two back 20 stone was considered a good target weight ...
|
 |
 target weight for what? A sumo wrestler?
|
 |
 Well that fat family don't look like they live in a des res suburb of Dundee, probably not too well off so how the the hell did the family afford to buy the amount of food required to get the children so fat in the first place? Benefits + Farm Foods = Fatties.
|
 |
 Having listened to Europe 1 this morning I now know that either Mike S works for them or they read BM. Their comment was a word for word translation of Mike's opening post.
|
 |
 Well I've not heard of Europe 1, so I guess they must have read BM.
|
 |
 Good job they read this thread then instead of some of the usual gibberish!
|
 |