Monday 23 November 2009 | Personalise | Help  
 FORUM
Discussions by:   Latest Posts | New Discussions | Hot Threads | Forum Topics
 Search forum: 
single speed ratios
21 to 38 of 38 messages. Page: 1  2  To post a reply you need to be a member - Join now.
I have thought about a 29er fork but isn't the rake (or some such technical term) also different,
Show/hide user stats

Kona Project II butt ugly fork but I think it's only 80-100mm corrected.

Like the idea of going for a 29er fork that's a good idea.

Show/hide user stats
It should be alright if the bike's set up for a longer travel fork anyway.STW mag did it with a Chameleon the other month,with a Surly Karate fork & 29" wheel,they said it rode fine....
Edited: 15/10/09 16:13
Show/hide user stats

Different offset, and hence trail for a given head angle. Hang on, let me do sums...

OK. Claimed 456 head angle with a 120mm fork is 69.5deg. Let's say you put a 100mm-equivalent rigid on there, and assume that you get a 70.5deg head angle (which it will roughly be). With 38mm offset (fairly normal for a 26in fork) that's 78mm of trail, which is perfectly acceptable. Or you put a 29er fork that's 465mm a-c (which is a vague average of three forks found on Google), which'll put the HA back to something like, er, 68.5ish, but the fork's got 44mm of offset which gives you 84.5mm of trail. Which, coincidentally, is the same as the original 69.5deg head angle with a 38mm fork offset.

I think it'd work.

Show/hide user stats

What you said was:

OK. Claimed 456 head angle with a 120mm fork is 69.5deg. Let's say you put a 100mm-equivalent rigid on there, and assume that you get a 70.5deg head angle (which it will roughly be). With 38mm offset (fairly normal for a 26in fork) that's 78mm of trail, which is perfectly acceptable. Or you put a 29er fork that's 465mm a-c (which is a vague average of three forks found on Google), which'll put the HA back to something like, er, 68.5ish, but the fork's got 44mm of offset which gives you 84.5mm of trail. Which, coincidentally, is the same as the original 69.5deg head angle with a 38mm fork offset.

What I read was:

Gobble gobble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble wabble blah goooble wobble dobble blah blah wibble wibble offset.

This member’s stats are private

OK. Claimed 456 head angle with a 120mm fork is 69.5deg. Let's say you put a 100mm-equivalent rigid on there, and assume that you get a 70.5deg head angle (which it will roughly be). With 38mm offset (fairly normal for a 26in fork) that's 78mm of trail, which is perfectly acceptable. Or you put a 29er fork that's 465mm a-c (which is a vague average of three forks found on Google), which'll put the HA back to something like, er, 68.5ish, but the fork's got 44mm of offset which gives you 84.5mm of trail. Which, coincidentally, is the same as the original 69.5deg head angle with a 38mm fork offset.

you need to get out more Mr Davis !

Show/hide user stats

There you go,told you it'd work .

Show/hide user stats

You could have just skipped to "I think it'd work"

I have a spreadsheet to work that stuff out. Is that a good or a bad thing?

OK I love it when a plan comes together.

Unfortunately, crc have let me down on the singlespeed crank I ordered, it was in stock when I ordered it, now its not in until the 11th of next month, unfortunately its 70pounds from them and 120euros from the German suppliers so I will wait.

Show/hide user stats
Why not use a normal crank with just one cog~
Show/hide user stats
Aye, what BHB said. "Singlespeed crank" = "the crank you've already got with two chainrings removed". If you want to be flash you could get some short chainring bolts
This member’s stats are private
Don't you have a young offspring you could be spending time with rather than creating spreadsheets MD?
Show/hide user stats
And right now they're in bed and all is quiet. For a change
This member’s stats are private
the spreadsheets come ready made, it just involves typing in new numbers, any monkey could do it.
Show/hide user stats
Only thing I remember about spreadsheets is in windows if you type in X97 L97 press tab and click on chart (or something like that) it opens up a flight simulator...
I don't have an existing crank, its an old frame i am building up.
Show/hide user stats
I've got a Truvativ ss stylo crankset you can have msp foc if you need one. 180mm length but a bit scuffed and ISIS.

 

Page: 1  2  


Change stats view
Make external bookmarkAdd to My Bookmarks

« Previous thread   -   Next thread »
Home > Forum > MaintenanceForum jump  
Support our sponsors
 

Support our sponsors

Offers, Competitions and Promotions
win free stuff with rcuk

Squirt Competition
Win 1 of 50 bottles of SQUIRT - Long lasting Dry Lube
Ticket2RideBC Adventures
Advertorial: Ticket2RideBC specialises in guided mountain bike adventures
British Heart Foundation
Advertorial: Get cycling for the BHF and raise vital money