PS. Again as a roadie bike snob I would never buy a Trek but for some reason as an mtb it doesn't bother me. Is there and mtb equivalent to the 'all the gear no idea' Trek rider in US Postal gear?
If I was looking for a hardtail now, the Whyte 905 would be top of my list. I know it's dangerous to judge purely by magazine review, but I reckon it sounds a fantastic package and ride for just under £1500. I was saying to my Bruv that it looks like a match for our custom built Cotic Souls whilst saving £300 a piece (and some weight saving too). Check out the latest What Mountain Bike - it looks impressive.
If you say they're very different you must be referring to the carbon Scott: a proper racer that feels great going flat out for a couple of hours or so but becomes wearisome when you slow down or get tired. The Whyte is the British longer travel steel hardtail (but in aluminium) which is supposed to be everything to everybody but doesn't appeal to me, but might if I actually got to ride one. On paper it's just neither here (racer) or there (steel hard nut).
The 905 gets good reviews, and the fork (Reba 120mm maxle) is very good - I've one on my On One.
I'm sure you could build up an On One 456 with a decent fork for £1500, I'm happy with mine.
If you want an all-rounder (including kiddie duties), I'd probably be looking at steel, although alloy is lighter (and not much heavier than carbon).
On One are current doing their 456 Ti frame at £800, you'd probably struggle though to build one up for £1500 with good parts - but I'm sure you could build one up with the key bits (and cheap stuff), and then treat it as a 'project', for when deals appear.