I've heard that under braking rear suspension is less effective. Any truth to this? Anyone have any science to back it up? I havent noticed this on my NRS yet.
Basically, caliper is mounted to the frame so when you apply the brake it stops the chainstay from pivoting around the axle so locking up the suspension. You'll notice it as a sort of hopping from the rear when you brake hard downhill on a rough surface.
Some will be more affected than others under braking. Also the amount of travel will affect this as the longer the travel the more noticeable it well be. Some big hucking bikes have a floating disc mount so that the force exerted by the rear brake is isolated from the rear swing arm.
I have a Stumpjumper FSR and putting the brakes has now noticeable effect on the feel and function of the suspension just like the catalogue says.
I doubt whether you'll notice it unless you really try. It's certainly not worth adding a floating caliper mount to solve the 'problem'. Orange have dropped the IBS from the 224 for 2006 and that has much more travel than your Giant.
Cheers mike. On a slight tangent. with my fox F100X. How the hell am i supposed to set the sag on them? I mean i have set the psi reccomended for my weight but i cant test the sag as its obviously got the inertia valve that locks it out from rider induced bob.
I have my moments Smidge :-) I tend not to be helpful when some cock who clearly knows nothing about a subject comes and sticks his nose into a sensible thread.