I'm after a pair of tough but grippy and fast tyres to put on for late Spring through to Autumn, and have decided on Maxxis High Rollers 26x2.35's.
However, i'm unsure which exact tyres in the range to go for as there are a huge variety of different types with different durometer ratings, tpi, beads, sticky rubber etc etc.
I'm after ones which will be fast and grippy, but tough enough to take up to the lakes this summer for some epic rides. Ideally folding bead, and for use with inner tubes.
Any advice from owners / users much appreciated, and any recommendations on where to pick up a pair cheaply.
I've got the fairly bog standard 2.5 Steel bead one on the front and it's a pretty good tyre all round...the only thing is the rubber lets go v quick on wet roots...but then again I don't know of any tyre which works well on that shit!
I got the 2.5 because of the volume of the tyre when I was running rigid forks and they certainly seem to work well at lower pressures.
I'm after a pair of tough but grippy and fast tyres to put on for late Spring through to Autumn
Late spring is 2 to 3 months away as today is the 1st day of spring by then it will be hopefully dry and there are better tyres for those conditions than High Rollers.
I've already got Racing Ralphs which I use in the dry months on my local South Downs trails, but i'll be spending a couple of weeks riding in the Lake District and North Yorks Moors this year so wanted something less prone to pinch flats or sidewall damage. The conditions are also pretty changeable up there so I thought more of an all-rounder like the High Rollers would be ideal?
I've been running 2.35 60a High Rollers on my XC bike since September. I think they're excellent - a bit heavy, but grippy and I haven't had a puncture since fitting them (make sure you get the dual ply sidewall).
I have a 60a dual ply and it seems to be a good tyre but imo it is crap in the muddy conditions, I have heard people say the total opposite tho ! the 60a will roll better than the 42a which has a softer compound and wears quicker, If my lb d the 42a in stock when i was after one i would of opted for the 42a. In the dry and slightly damp with my 2.35, 60a ive not had any problems and i can run low pressure to get a wider grip and dig in more.
Dan's right - 42A Supertacky front and a 60A rear. Good combo for all round riding IMO.
Word of advice to all - don't put a supertacky on the rear unless you like being drained of all energy and don't pyt a Racing Ralph on the front unless you enjoy having cosmetic dentistry performed.
xcman ! What do you think of the swampys in thick shitty mud ?? I find i slip about in mud but they seem to be decent at everything else. Even in the dry.
Job Noc, reason I got swamp Things was a mate was climbing past me with one on when my rear was spinning out. They are good but it is a 2,1 I'm running so twends to bite through.
Nog single ply and double ply is the side wall casing only realy need double ply for DH.
Its the thickness of the side walls. Single ply is the thinest and lightest dual ply it double and heavier to 3ply which is for big wide tyres i.e downhill types bikes. Thing with thicker ply is you can run at low pressure without the rick of as many pinch punctures. XC riding i would only go single to dual ply.
The weight of the dual ply compared to single ply would be about 200g per tyre but i find it gives me more confidence knowing the tyres is more stronger.