Gear News
You are looking at: Home : Gear News

RockShox 2007

RockShox takes aim at the freeride market with four all-new forks


Posted: 27 June 2006
by Mike Davis

rockshox07_missioncontrol_l (3K) rockshox07_twostep_lo (3K)

Left: Various twiddly bits to operate Mission Control damping; Right: The Two-Step travel control dial

rockshox07_totem_lo (8K)

Totem

rockshox07_domain_lo (7K)

Domain

rockshox07_lyrik_lo (7K)

Lyrik

rockshox07_argyle_lo (10K)

Argyle

The eagle-eyed will no doubt have noticed that RockShox hasn't been doing too much in the long-travel/freeride area of late. There's the Pike, which is really an all-mountain fork, there's various species of Boxxer, all of which are DH race forks but there's nothing to go up against the likes of the Marzocchi 66 or Manitou Travis. That's all set to change for 2007. All of the current RockShox forks are carried over in slightly revised form (except the venerable Judy/J2 entry level fork, which is binned in favour of a new unit called Dart) - the Reba gets a slimmed-down crown, the Pike's lower legs are tweaked a little, things like that - while there are four new forks occupying various points along the all-mountain/freeride continuum.

There are some new features found across several models of the new range. First we have the new Mission Control damping system, a development of the existing Motion Control system designed with longer-travel (ie upwards of 150mm) forks in mind. Mission Control has separate high and low speed compression circuits. The compression gubbinses are independently adjustable - fiddling with the high-speed one has no effect on the low-speed and vice versa - via the stacked knobs on top of the fork leg. There's also a second rebound circuit designed to allow the fork to recover more quickly from bigger hits without getting all out of kilter on pattery stuff. Mission Control-damped forks also have an "efficiency mode", engaged by twisting and popping out the top dial - it's designed to be simply engaged and disengaged by a gloved hand and gives you a slightly-compliant lockout with an adjustable blow-off as per Motion Control's Floodgate.

2007's funky spring feature is Two-Step. This is a lock-down system for air forks, but unlike things like Marzocchi's ETA you retain a healthy amount of travel when the fork is locked down - for example, the Lyrik fork is 160mm at full travel and 115 locked down. It doesn't get unduly stiff in short-travel mode, either, so you still have a useful suspension fork but with a substantially lower front end for better weight distribution on climbs. It works by shuffling oil between chambers to act as a kind of liquid spacer. You don't have to unload the fork to get it to re-extend, it just eases itself back to full travel.

Then there's the updated Maxle quick-release through-axle system. It's now dubbed Maxle 360, because you can close the lever in any orientation without having the adjust the nut end. It's a small tweak, but adds convenience. And we like convenience.

Top of the travel tree is the mighty Totem. It's a 180mm travel single-crown fork, with 40mm aluminium stanchions and chunky magnesium lowers featuring a prominent bulge where the bushings sit. The lowers also have post-mount fittings for a 203mm brake - all of the new RockShox forks are post-mount for 2007, although that considerable part of the range made up of existing forks is still IS mount. Totem also has a "Speedlube" system - there's a drain plug at the bottom of each leg into which you can fit an Avid bleed kit (one example of the increasing integration between products from different parts of the SRAM empire) and draw out the lubrication oil. If it looks OK, just squirt it back in. If it's all manky, dump it and put some fresh in. That should extend "proper" service intervals. In a first for RockShox, the Totem will be available in a 1.5in steerer version as well as the 1 1/8in standard. The 1.5in model is considerably lighter as the steerer doesn't have to be as thick - claimed weight is 5.9lb for the Solo Air version. It's also available with coil springs or the Two-Step air spring system. Oh, and it comes in a plain colour with a sticker pack so you can decorate it how you like, or not.

The Totem will be fairly pricey, but it has a less-expensive brother in the shape of the Domain. This is also a 180mm travel fork, but priced from £329.99. To get it to that price, the 40mm aluminium stanchions are dropped in favour of 35mm chromoly ones (which may sound a bit undernourished, but the steel stanchions will keep things plenty stiff) and the lowers are accordingly more slimline. Damping is Motion Control plus a "Speedstack", which is an extra shim system to help it along in a long-travel application. There's no Speedlube and no Two-Step option - it's plain coil or U-Turn only. There will be a 1.5in steerer option, though.

The lower leg casting from the Domain is also found on the Lyrik, which, with 160mm of travel, sits above the existing Pike fork. In common with the Domain it has 35mm stanchions, but on the Lyrik they're aluminium to cut weight. The internals, meanwhile, are along the lines of those found in the Totem - Mission Control damping on one side and a choice of U-Turn coil (115-160mm), Solo Air or Two-Step Air (115 or 160mm) springs on the other. The Lyric weighs between 5.1 and 5.7lb depending on spring choice, and there's a 1.5in steerer option too.

The last "new" fork is only half-new really. The Argyle is a specialist dirt jump fork that marries the existing Pike lowers to a new steerer/crown/stanchion assembly featuring 32mm chromoly stanchions, and then fills the space inside with Motion Control damping and coil or air springs to give 100mm of travel in a low-bendability package.


Previous article Previous article:
I Want A Podium!
Next article:Next article
MaXx Exposure returns

Discuss this story

Lyrik 2 step air is pretty much perfect, as long as the price is reasonible I'll be having me one of these :)


Holding off on Pike purchase for sure.


Posted: 27/06/2006 16:51

Click for more dribble :-)
Posted: 27/06/2006 16:57

Why would you want such overkill forks dylan?
Posted: 27/06/2006 16:57

Sorry, i forgot you have a freeride bike as well as HT.

Still think they are specialist forks rather than do it all type like pikes & revelations.
Posted: 27/06/2006 16:58

unfortunately, the cost of the new '07 line up will be comparable with that of other manufacturers such as Fox, so VFM isn't going to be so great.
Posted: 27/06/2006 17:02

Yep, beef up the freerider travel and stiffness wise, but the flick of a switch and it's still rideable up hills :)


Posted: 27/06/2006 17:02

Thats it Smidge, depress me :(

*applys for new credit card offer that came through the door LOL *


Posted: 27/06/2006 17:03

the cost of the new '07 line up will be comparable with that of other manufacturers such as Fox

Except that you get more features for a given price than the equivalent Fox. Even the cheapest Lyrik has independently-adjustable low and high-speed compression damping and the lockdown.
Posted: 27/06/2006 17:06

Just seen the Price on Goog's $1050 US $'s, so that'll convert to around £1050 UK £'s as per normal :(


£579 direct change, or £677 with VAT added :(


Fox 36 talas price :(


Posted: 27/06/2006 17:11

Mike, cheapest Lyrik Lockout, not Lockdown thats the top model for that.



Posted: 27/06/2006 17:12

Whatever. I never use 'em, remember ;-)
Posted: 27/06/2006 17:22

Tis true :), main selling point for me.


Posted: 27/06/2006 17:25

dyl, what about the magura wotan?
Posted: 27/06/2006 18:09

Dunno, anything at all about that.

Travel ?? and does it have a down/lockdown facility, and price ??

Likely go back to Pike U-turns, which hopefully will drop the price a tad.


Posted: 27/06/2006 18:19

Certainly a option Mike, found the BM write up on them. thanks

Depending on price, standard Q/R though, hmmm.




Posted: 27/06/2006 18:25

Mike D. I agree, plenty more features for the money, but are they really necessary? Some people think so, but my personal feeling is there is too much to adjust.

However, i am getting more and more tempted away from fox over to RS. and when my F100X are at the end of their life i will see what RS are doing and seriously consider them.

I do feel that a large portion of the appeal of RS this year has been their amazing price/performance which seemed to blow everyone else out of the water.
Posted: 27/06/2006 18:50

I think RS is better than Fox these days aswell, but I like adjustability, if the 36 Talas's had a lock down, I'd be tempted but there kinda basic for the money.

Rode Reba's recently, 100mm travel, hugged the ground better and felt like more travel than my Fox's, they where to hard aswell so potentially even better.

I do like the idea of the XXT Fox though, I'd like a fork lockouted kinda on descents to keep my weight back more, rather than nearly bottomed out.

( mate locks his reba's out on steep descents for this )


Posted: 27/06/2006 18:59

i absolutely love my F100X, amazing fork, super stiff, etc etc etc.

But come 1-2 yrs time when my fork is due replacing, then i will definately reasses the suspension market, its definately not so clear cut as it was at the start of this year.
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:23

Okay it's not fair comparing old Vannila to brand new dual air RS Reba, but the Reba has it at the moment.

The vannila was once the best, and I've upgraded to the 05 damper aswell which improved the fork abit.


Posted: 27/06/2006 19:26

How can you compare a 130mm coil fork with an 85-100mm racey(ish) fork????

Thats like comparing Apples with Lemons.
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:30

Sheesh, how many Rockshox forks does that make? I'm getting lost, there are too many instantly forgetable names for my little brain. Not to worry, the latest batch won't fit any of my bikes. They do look pretty and sound good on paper though.
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:34

Smidge, 125mm LOL, you'd expect the Coil fork to eat the Reba alive, so as the Reba won hands down, thats a pretty damn good test to me.

The $$ prices are nasty though John, no £200 specials in that new line up, sadly.


Posted: 27/06/2006 19:36

lol John :o) i am with you, 100mm is about the max i need. ALso my new Carbon Anthem won't like anything more than 100mm.
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:36

You've got a Anthem ?? your NRS being retired already hey!!


Posted: 27/06/2006 19:39

Carbon anthems r not out yet. I have been offered a price i cannot refuse tho.
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:48

Do Rockshox still have a constant loss lubrification system? :o)
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:51

All forks do, if you over fill them a tad :)


Posted: 27/06/2006 19:52

Rude to refuse then Smidge, but likely not as efficent as a NRS with loads of negative sag dialed in ??


Posted: 27/06/2006 19:53

Overfilled, there's hardly any oil left!
Posted: 27/06/2006 19:58

Oils cheap, don't worry about abit of loss.

the new RS forks, have a port where you can add and take oil out, loads easier to add abit, when it goes splat :)


Posted: 27/06/2006 20:01

well i was sceptical too Dyl, but apaprently it is pretty much as efficient as an NRS and about a million times more plush.
Posted: 27/06/2006 20:03

definately way more plush, so definately better over rougher terrain, NRS is near a HT really.


Posted: 27/06/2006 20:08

well, yes kind of, the NRS is much nicer than a hardtail over my local trails. But from what i've read and seen the Anthem builds on the concept of the NRS, so not only is it just as efficient, but also super plush.

Also i've been offered giants trade price on the frameset, so pretty hard not to accept. And it's all carbon :o) i've been super sceptical about using it as a frame material, but with a lifetime warranty on it, i am willing to give it a crack (harharhar) :o)
Posted: 27/06/2006 20:49

Carbon Anthem? Nice.

I'm keen to try out the Carbon Reign though.

Oh, sorry, did I drop a trade secret bombshell there?

;-)

You heard it here first folks!
Posted: 27/06/2006 20:51

carbon reign eh?

*thinks scott ransom*

but you get less of a stigma! result
Posted: 27/06/2006 20:59

...and a Carbon Trance, oh and a Reign with 6.7 inches of travel anyone (apparently anyway :o))??? Bare in mind though, i do chat to my old boss/current friend who is a Giant dealer and drinks with someone high up in Giant allegedly.
Posted: 27/06/2006 20:59

I reckon you want an 80mm fork on an Anthem, Smidge ;-)
Posted: 27/06/2006 21:30

ahh i know mike i know. Thats what they said about the NRS too, but i have the F100X now, i can reduce it to 80mm, but the axle to crown wont be shortened by much due to longer stanchions than the F80X.

i reckon the inverted stem and flat bars will do the job nicely (what you think?), but ultimately, if it doesnt, then i will flog the forks and consider a new set.

I also read this (Giant Australia):


"Regarding the comments about the rear-weighting of the bike during climbing, please bear in mind that in Australia, we spec the whole Anthem range with 100mm forks (in other markets, the bike uses 80mm forks). We do this for several reasons.

"With Fox 80mm travel forks, you cannot convert them to 100mm (you can however convert the 100mm Fox forks down to 80mm). Accordingly, we spec the Fox at 100mm to give the consumer the option of lowering them and we spec the rest of the range at 100mm for consistency. Overall, we'd rather the consumer had the relatively cheap option of having the forks lowered to 80mm if they choose to drop the front end of the bike (and steepening up the head angle to the true 72 degrees. The AU bikes are more like 71 degrees with 100mm travel fork).

"Also, in our opinion, the trend even in XC/race in Australia has been leaning more toward 100mm travel forks in the past couple of years. The platform technology allows the forks to still perform very efficiently at this travel and the added travel allows a more aggressive style."


Also: Anthem with 100mm Travel

You can see that the Dues XC stem is running upside down here. Thats exactly how i run mine now on my NRS and on the Anthem when i get it.

The HA is said to be 71degrees with 100mm fork and 72degrees with 80mm fork, i think this can be negated with inverting the stem.

What are your thoughts Mike after riding the '06 alu version?
Posted: 27/06/2006 22:14

Smidge, Stem although it'll keep your weight lower in ways, its the angle of the bike thats important that it won't fix totally.

It'll ownly be a issue on stupidly steep climbs anyway, it'll be quicker and more agressive going down with 100mm.

And the Fox 100 Fork, in 80mm mode is likely only 5mm's longer anyway ( you got measurement ), so 71.75degrees approx.



Either way, not enough to warrant new forks mate.


Posted: 27/06/2006 23:06

I guess :o) i will have a chat to my mate who owns the LBS.
Posted: 27/06/2006 23:14

See more comments...
Talkback: RockShox 2007

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: