Gear News
You are looking at: Home : Gear News

Shimano SLX: First look

Yes, it's 2009 already. Shimano repositions LX, drops Hone and replaces both with the all-new SLX mid-range group - and here it is


Posted: 18 February 2008
by Mike Davis

shimano09_slx_levers_lo (20K) shimano09_slx_crank_lo (26K) shimano09_slx_mech_lo (27K) shimano09_slx_brake_lo (22K)

We've often commented in the past on the somewhat arbitrary nature of the bike industry's calendar, and the increasing randomness of the model year. The announcement of Shimano's all-new SLX groupset chucks yet another spanner in the already somewhat clattery works - the parts you see here in final prototype form will be on sale in July.

We'd speculate that Shimano is anticipating heavy demand from bike manufacturers for this new kit, and wishes to avoid the supply issues that it's had with other new groups over the last couple of years (most notably the Ultegra road group) by cranking up production of ostensibly 2009 model year parts with plenty of time in hand. And based on what we've seen, it's right to expect packed order books - SLX looks set to raise the mid-level component bar quite considerably.

The current Shimano line-up has Deore LX and Hone running roughly parallel in price terms, with LX being the XCish group and Hone being a kind of pocket Saint for more robust applications (although many of the Hone parts are effectively the same as LX with a different finish). For 2009, Deore LX becomes a "trekking" group (think upright riding positions, comfy saddles, the Netherlands) with the new SLX group coming with a myriad of options to cover all persuasions of MTBing from XC to freeride. The line is drawn at "extreme freeride", although where exactly that line is is open to debate...

Shimano has styled the SLX parts with a distinctive angular look - it's clearly a lot more "ggrr!" than LX. The brake levers follow the general layout of the existing XTR and XT units, and like XT they get Servo-Wave variable leverage gubbinses that promise 20% more power. The levers also feature tool-free reach adjustment, although XT's free-stroke adjustment is missing here.

Also quite XTesque are the shifters. We're big fans of the 2-Way Release triggers that let you upshift (and it'll always be upshift with SLX - there's no low-normal derailleur option, and no Dual Control either) with either thumb or index finger. The shifter pods also share XT's removable gear display, with a cover plate tucked away inside. Take the gear display off and you can mount the shifters outboard of the levers, an option that lets you use one finger on the very tip of the brake lever and still be able to reach the shifters without moving your hands.

The shifters drive a pair of new derailleurs. Shimano's Shadow tucked-in rear mech design renders Hone's axle-mount derailleur redundant, and its been reinterpreted for SLX. The new mech will be available in medium and long-cage models and weighs 260g.

Up front things get quite interesting. As part of SLX's "most things to most riders" ethos, two flavours of crankset will be available. The outboard-bearing bottom bracket and hollow forged crank arms are used on both, complete with steel pedal thread insert. The crankset in the picture is the conventional triple-ring setup, which features a composite/steel middle ring like that found on XT and promising the durability of a steel ring at the weight of aluminium and better stiffness than either. Chainring sizes for the triple are 44/32/22.

For those all-mountain types there's a new double chainrign and bashguard option. Shimano has offered twin-and-bash options before, but has always just taken the outer ring off and put a bashguard on, leaving a not-all-that-useful 22/32 combination. SLX, however, gives you a bigger 36T ring sitting inboard of a "honeycomb" bashguard - it's moulded with lots of hollows inside to reduce weight.

One of the frustrations of running two chainrings is that MTB front derailleurs are designed for three - the radius of the cage follows that of a 42 or 44T chainring. SLX has the option of a unique front mech optimised for the 22/36 double chainrings, with a much smaller radius and shorter cage. Without an outer ring to worry about, the double mech can be run lower and the shorter cage helps to reduce chain drop. Another benefit is considerably increased tyre and frame clearance, particularly important with fat tyres and full suspension. As well as the conventional band-mounted derailleur, Shimano has devised a direct-mount version that bolts on to a specific boss on the frame, giving frame designers more freedom by letting them do without a conventional seat tube (or stub thereof) at the bottom bracket.

SLX is finished off by the hubs. As is Shimano's way, they all run on good old serviceable, adjustable and side-load friendly cup-and-cone bearings. The rear hub has a quick-engagement freehub and there'll be a 20mm through-axle front hub alongside the regular 9mm QR option.

No word on exact pricing yet, but SLX will be in the current LX/Hone ballpark. We're pretty impressed by what we've seen so far - the new parts have all the key features from the higher-end groups plus a few useful things all of their own. Shimano's probably right to get the forges running quickly - we expect to see this stuff everywhere on next year's bikes...


Previous article Previous article:
Win an Olympus camera: The Nominees
Next article:Next article
Fox and Shimano go 15mm

Discuss this story

It's interesting that Dual Control and Rapid Rise are completely missing from SLX. It's nice to know that Shimano will listen to feedback and have moved away from their original "this is the future, get used to it" line.
Posted: 18/02/2008 12:30

Well they didnt have much choice, i know after owning a single bike with rapid rise my next bike would've been equipped with Sram had shimano not dropped the stupid idea.
Posted: 18/02/2008 14:18

So LX is becoming a Touring groupset?

*worries that Ramascese will sprout Brookes saddle and panniers..*


Posted: 18/02/2008 14:22

No, LX becoming Trekking is more to do with those high end Euro 'fitness' type bikes with flat bars.  They're massive on the continent, and the 2008 Deore XT had a specific sub-group of components aimed at that market.  I guess Deore LX is simply following that lead, with SLX giving a bit more of a dilineation between the types of use.
Posted: 18/02/2008 14:34

But I like rapid rise, got it on both bikes now.  Prefer when you need to shift whilst climbing.
Posted: 18/02/2008 15:02

It's still on XT if you don't want a Shadow mech. SLX will be Shadow-only.
Posted: 18/02/2008 15:22

Oh good, I don't think my tiny brain would cope with having to get used to back to front shifting...
Posted: 18/02/2008 15:26

Rapid rise is illogical as it realies purely on the spring in the mech to bring it up to larger gears,  where as normal rise the cable pulls it there,  and a lesser spring is required to drop down the block.

Swapping from 1 to the other frequently would just be insane to!!


Posted: 18/02/2008 15:45

Rapid rise is illogical as it realies purely on the spring in the mech to bring it up to larger gears,  where as normal rise the cable pulls it there,  and a lesser spring is required to drop down the block.

Neither is really any more logical than the other, it's just what you're used to. Low normal is pretty damn ace for downshifts on climbs, but not so ace that I rushed out and adopted it wholesale  

Swapping from 1 to the other frequently would just be insane to!!

I have one low-normal bike, it catches me out the first few shifts but you get used to it. It's not really any worse than switching between SRAM and Shimano triggers, or MTB to road STI or something.  


Posted: 18/02/2008 15:52

I've been riding SRAM attacks for ages,  went back to deore on the HT,  really couldn't get used to the shifting even after 3 or 4 rides.


Posted: 18/02/2008 16:35

As with anything, if you switch more frequently you acclimatise quicker. I seem to end up with different shifters nearly every ride
Posted: 18/02/2008 16:39

Same here, four bikes with different shifters, they all work well.
Posted: 18/02/2008 16:43

I've one bike with low-normal dual controls and with with high-normal triggers.  I don't find it particularly tricky switching between then,

I kind of like the angular look of the new group anyway, looks smart 


Posted: 18/02/2008 16:56

Looks a bit robocop to me.
Posted: 18/02/2008 16:57

Makes me want to hold off on getting XT servo waves and Shadow mech,  I'll wait and get the cheaper LX version   sorted!!

Roled into Deore for 2010 I bet,  hmmmm Deore !!


Posted: 18/02/2008 17:16

Overall, looks cool, but I'm very keen on dual control. The pads look really inaccessible: they're deeply recessed so that they look difficult to get at.
Posted: 18/02/2008 18:18

I think it was a need to redifine the groupset as I think most people would always spend the extra few pounds and go with XT or save the few pounds and go Deore. I have also heard this is going to replace the Hone groupset, don't know how true that is though.
Posted: 18/02/2008 18:51

From the news article I think it said Hone is being dropped.

Yeah it's a more all mountain ( atleast in looks ) than XC chainset which does make it a seperate product not a slightly heavier/cheaper product which is a good thing.


Posted: 18/02/2008 19:35

On current bikes I've got down tube, sti road, bar end, rapid fire, rapid fire dual release, SRAM triggers, grip shift and thumbies. :-/
Posted: 18/02/2008 19:50

I like the angular look too, the chainset and brake levers make me wanna buy them on looks alone!

Agreed on the shifter thing, I have five bikes four of which with different shifters and have no problem, two with lx shifters, one with sram gripshift, one with indexed rotary thumb shifters (the old above bar type that came after friction jobbies) and one with ye-olde non-indexed rotary thumb friction shifters.

However the issue of gears going in the opposite direction is a bit different, after years of doing it the conventional way, even if I got accustomed to it, when under pressure on a stiff climb, fast descent, or undulating trail where you're constantly up and down the gears I'd tend to forget, with obvious consequences!


Posted: 18/02/2008 19:56

You wouldn't have that shifting problem if all your bikes were singlespeeds.
Posted: 18/02/2008 20:00

I'm most interested by the 2 ring specific parts, as I don't see the point of a bash on an AM type bike if its going around trail centres, but when you get into more off piste 'gnarr' stuff I worry a bit about pringling the big ring...
Posted: 19/02/2008 12:15

Yes, always protect your big ring, you really don't want it to get damged and torn...
Posted: 19/02/2008 12:44

boom boom!
Posted: 19/02/2008 13:02

yay for the double ring front mech! about time...


Posted: 21/02/2008 18:01

Talkback: Shimano SLX: First look

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: