Gear News
You are looking at: Home : Gear News

Specialized shifts all-mountain goalposts for 2007

They've been busy at Morgan Hill - not just new bikes, but their very own forks and shocks too. We check out the 2007 Enduro SL - 150mm travel, 27lb...


Posted: 10 July 2006
by Mike Davis

Side view FutureShock E150 fork AFR shock 25mm through-axle one-piece crown and stem direct-mount front mech Two-position shock mount

It's hard work being a major bicycle manufacturer. Not only do you have to keep coming up with new stuff, but you have to cater for an ever-wider array of riding styles and hence end up with a bunch of different models that constantly need tweaking to keep them appealing to the people for whom they were originally designed.

All of which brings us to Specialized, and more specifically the Enduro. As the name suggests, the Enduro was first conceived as a ride all day, do it all kind of bike. But what with being pretty stoutly built and packing a fair bit of travel for the time, it was inevitable that people would start doing things with them that lay somewhat outside the original design parameters.

Naturally enough, Specialized responded, and each iteration of the Enduro got a bit more travel and a bit more strength until by the 2006 model year it was less "all-mountain" and more pedallable freeride bike. Which was all well and good, but seemed to leave a lightweight, long-travel, do-it-all hole in the range.

So for 2007 the current Enduro platform lives on only in a range of SX Trail light freeride bikes, all with coil shocks and burly specs but without having the word "Enduro" on them. And slotting in next door is the all-new Enduro SL, which at first glance appears to be occupying the same sort of space as the Scott Ransom and Santa Cruz Nomad but upon closer inspection looks like it could be about to move the all-mountain goalposts clear off the field. The new bike was revealed recently at Specialized's European marketing office in Bavaria, which has some rather handy nearby mountains...

The Enduro SL is noteworthy in all sorts of ways, so much so that it's difficult to know where to start. But one particular aspect of the bike is likely to have far-reaching consequences throughout the industry - rather than buying in suspension components, Specialized has opted to design and manufacture its own forks and shocks.

This isn't a completely unprecedented move. Cannondale has been making its own forks for as long as it's been doing suspension bikes, Scott is well-known for making its own rear shocks and Specialized itself dabbled with forks under the Future Shock banner in the early 90s. But its new suspension strategy is of remarkable scope. Specialized is far and away the biggest company to start doing its own suspension, and it's not just dabbling - Specialized shocks will be found on bikes across the 2007 range, and the Enduro SL features an all-new Specialized fork too.

It's a bold move, but Specialized clearly believes that it's the right one. The idea is that if it designs frames, shocks and forks together, the combined elements will work better together. Clearly it'll have a lot more control over how its suspension components work than if it continued to buy them in. And of course it means more unique selling points on the bikes.

spec07_futureshock_action_l (9K)

Boingy boffin

The man behind Specialized's new suspension projects is Mike McAndrews. He's been working in two-wheeled suspension approximately for ever, from tuning bikes for pro MX racers, through being head of R&D at RockShox for six years to heading up Fox's fork development. He also did a stint at Maverick, and the FutureShock E150 fork is conceptually not dissimilar to Maverick's DUC32 - it's a long-travel trail fork that uses dual crowns to cut weight and an oversized axle to add stiffness.

Despite occupying a similar sort of place in the fork firmament, the E150 is a very different beast to the DUC, though. Starting at the bottom, the through-axle is a huge 25mm diameter - the biggest that'll fit through a standard brake rotor. With the big axle doing most of the work in keeping the legs moving together, the brake arch can be made super-slim. 35mm stanchions are held in the two crowns, which again can be made lighter as they're sharing the load between them. The dual-crown design also means that the steerer tube has less to do, so that can be lighter too. The top crown also incorporates the stem (which will be available in a various lengths and rises). The upshot of all this is a 150mm travel fork that weighs a claimed 4.5lb, or a whisker over 2kg.

Inside there's a large-volume air spring in one leg and a stack of damping circuits in the other. The compression damping combines a low-speed port, a conventional shim stack and a blow-off valve called the "Spike Valve". The idea is to allow the fork to remain still under the kinds of forces generated by the rider moving his or her weight while still allowing it to pass lots of oil quickly when a big impact comes along.

The Spike Valve and large volume air spring is also found in the AFR rear shock. One of the key benefits of designing the shock and bike together is that you can ideally match the rate curve of the suspension geometry to the spring curve of the shock to end up with the overall feel that you want.

Specialized shocks will also be found on 2007's Stumpjumper FSR and Epic models, of which more shortly…

With Specialized suspension front and rear, the Enduro SL is the best example of this new direction. But it's not just the suspension that's innovative. The SL is a ground-up reinterpretation of the Enduro concept, and the needs of the all day, all-mountain rider have led to the designers doing a bunch of things differently.

The main frame is FACT carbon fibre for stiffness and light weight - the frame is claimed to weigh just 2.2kg (4.8lb). That's without a shock, but even adding 300g (an educated and mildly pessimistic guess) for the AFR shock still gives an all-up weight of 2.5kg (5.5lb) - mightily impressive for a 150mm travel frame.

In a first for Specialized, the rear shock is driven by a rocker-style linkage - rather than the traditional FSR arrangement of a link fixed to the seatstay at one end, the main frame at the other and the shock being driven from somewhere between the two, the Enduro link is attached to the frame in the middle and has the seatstay and shock at opposite ends. This has been done for a few reasons. For a start, it allows a vertical shock position, which gets the weight of the shock nearer the middle of the bike. It considerably simplifies the structure of the frame, allows a continuous seat tube for more saddle-lowering scope (although on the Enduro that's limited by the cranked seat tube) and makes space inside the frame for a traditionally-positioned bottle mount.

The bottom end of the shock is attached to one of two mounting holes down near the bottom bracket, giving you a choice of a steeper, taller setup or a more relaxed and low-slung one. Also in the bottom bracket area is a unique front mech mount. This is a traditionally tricky problem for full suspension designs, with manufacturers typically resorting to stub tubes or, as a last resort, E-type BB-mount derailleurs. The Enduro uses an E-type mech but without the BB plate - instead the mech bolts directly to bosses on the frame.

The whole thing is very clean-looking, and once the FutureShock E150 fork and S-Works component spec (XTR cranks, X.0 transmission, Magura brakes) have been added you end up with a remarkably light bike - it's claimed to weigh 12.2kg (27lb), and rumour had it that the bikes at the launch were actually under 12kg on account of having 2.1in tyres rather than the 2.3in items that production bikes will have.

spec07_enduro_action2_lo (13K)

The ride

At the time of writing it's July, and these bikes won't be available until the autumn, so inevitably all sorts of things weren't quite as they should be. Mostly this was suspension-related stuff - the AFR shock's compression lever featured some completely bewildering labelling that no-one could understand (but the function of the lever was fortunately easily explained), the rebound clicker on the forks was excessively hard to adjust, the pre-production fork internals on a couple of the bikes started to exhibit a few odd top/bottom-out behaviours and we're not convinced that the shock was yielding full travel. So our riding impressions are very much just a flavour of what the Enduro should ultimately have to offer.

And a very sweet flavour it is too. The main test loop that we took the Enduro round was almost exactly the sort of thing that an all-mountain bike ought to excel at - an hour-plus, not particularly technical but very steep climb followed by a descent that featured a bit of everything. Singletrack, high-speed rock gardens, boulders, ruts, drops - it certainly demanded attention.

On the way up, the E150 fork's lockdown feature helped the bike plot a straight course. We still found ourselves having to shuffle forward on the saddle and hunker down over the bars on the steep pitches, but we're talking properly 22/34 steep and we were running the slacker geometry setup too. The light weight and handy low-speed compression lever on the rear shock paid dividends too - we didn't feel like we were having to work substantially harder than riders on Stumpjumper FSRs and even reeled in a few Epics…

Then we had a great deal of fun on the descent, although bigger tyres would certainly have been welcome. While we're on the subject, the clearance below the fork brace wasn't over-generous even with the 2.1in tyres fitted. Only time will tell if that's likely to be an issue, but some tyre manufacturers' offerings are somewhat bigger for a given stated size than Specialized's.

Tyres notwithstanding, the front end of the Enduro felt great. The 25mm axle, dual crowns and direct-mount stem all combine to give great steering accuracy. This isn't a bike that's readily knocked off line, but when you want to head off in a new direction it's there with an alacrity that belies the relatively relaxed angles.

The rest of the bike felt suitably solid too, and despite the not-quite-finished nature of the fork and shock it was impressively composed once we'd spent a bit of time fiddling with the various knobs. It's certainly every bit as balanced from front to rear as you'd hope for a bike designed as one coherent package, and once we'd got into the trail a bit if proved to be a trustworthy ally.

We'll have to wait for production bikes to know for sure, but on this showing the Enduro looks likely to become something of an instant classic. It's certainly the lightest of all the bikes that you'd consider to be rivals, the performance is as good as any and the super-stiff fork really makes a difference. One thing's for sure - we're looking forward to autumn, and it's not often that we say that…


Previous article Previous article:
Dialled Bikes gets itself a dealer
Next article:Next article
Hot and sunny at Builth Wells

Discuss this story

not really all that new or exciting is it..??

tyre clearance will be a big issue for all mtn use, as will not being able to drop the seat-pin...
Posted: 10/07/2006 09:55

oops..

i meant whyte, or however you spell it, you know the one...




its grey, i think...!! ;-)

Posted: 10/07/2006 09:56

My Eyes!
Posted: 10/07/2006 10:27

Sea-urchin, erm, what...?

I'd say it's pretty big news. Not so much the bike but the return to in house shocks and forks - especially from someone like Spesh, that's going to impact on the industry for sure.

The bike itself looks pretty good and Enduro's always do well in the UK. I'd expect it to be a roaring success.

Oh, and if it is 27lb, it's still a pound lighter than a Whyte 46 with a fork that's a pound heavier.
Posted: 10/07/2006 10:41

Interesting move by specialized, going away from the FSR design and making their own shocks.

Possibly its due to them realizing their bikes being currently very expensive for what they are, fox shocks cost a bomb and just bump up the headline price. Will be interesting to see how expensive this new machine will be, sub £2k anyone?

Personally I'm interested in the specialized hardtails, they are beautiful but the M5 S-Works is £700 (I just can't afford that for a frame!).
Posted: 10/07/2006 10:55

I like it a lot.
Posted: 10/07/2006 11:12

I want one!
Posted: 10/07/2006 12:01

I think it looks like prety big news. I like the look of it. It's certainly more "new and exciting" than *yet another* virtually identical hard tail frame...

I don't think they've dumped the FSR 4-bar link design, they've just changed the shock actuation design, and for good reasons as discussed in the article. Another benefit is that the shock is now out of the mud-slinging line from the rear tyre, a big weakness with the older design.

The tyre clearance on the fork looks utterly abismal. And that's with 2.1" tyres, and the article says the production bikes will have 2.3". I assume that fork bridge is going to change before production. I certainly hope so.

I hope the suspension oddities aren't a sign of things to come - there's nothing more annoying than shocks that just plain don't work properly. (ok so maybe there is, but it is incredibly annoying when you've splashed a lot of cash!)

I like the look of the front mech design. I hope you'll be able to replace the mech when you see fit though! I hope standard Shimano E type mechs can be used - I don't know whether you can remove the BB plate or not, never having had to play with one.
Posted: 10/07/2006 13:21

The only concerns I'd really have with the design are the bolt on mech and the front tyre clearance. The second can presumedly be easily tweaked but bolt on mechs on an MTB would be a worry to me. What if the mech takes a rock hit or something jams between it and the wheel/chainset? Potential for a written off frame IMO.

BTW Pete, you'll have to check to see if they're doing kids sizes first. ;0P
Posted: 10/07/2006 13:40

Mike - any comparisions with the previous (current) version? OK, so they have saved weight, but disadvantaged themselves with dual crown, limited tyre clearance and the risk of in house shocks. As the current Enduro is such an awesome bike is it going to be worth it? I imagine as a long term strategy to world domination for Specialized the answer is probably yes but for the rider?

Don't get me wrong I'm not Specialized bashing - I own one and think it is the absolute business, but every time I have ever gone for an innovative product new to market I've had problems - so I'm now going down the route of wait and see how things perform for a season before investing.
Posted: 10/07/2006 13:47

Sandy Thomson wrote:

Will be interesting to see how expensive this new machine will be, sub £2k anyone?

Personally I'm interested in the specialized hardtails, they are beautiful but the M5 S-Works is £700 (I just can't afford that for a frame!).


Bear in mind that's the S-Works they're showing so it'll be priced accordingly. The 2006 Epic and Stumperjumper frames in carbon are £1800 excluding forks. That bike as they've reviewed will be running to 4 grand.

Posted: 10/07/2006 14:01

Aye new XTR on it n'all man!
Posted: 10/07/2006 14:12

which chodski will have one first?
Posted: 10/07/2006 14:25

Sorry Spesh, thought I'd stay with you forever - but THAT's so fugly it makes even a Nomad look good.......
Posted: 10/07/2006 15:12

Looks to make the all mountain weight weenies among us very happy.

Bold moving, going in house for your own shocks / forks, cuts someone out of your profit margins hey.

It's going to be 3K to 4K range isn't it.


Posted: 10/07/2006 15:33

Drawing the Whyte 46 comparison again, isn't that almost £3K? Economics states that you have to compete with your nearest rivals so a same spec version will probably be a similar price. The S-Works full XTR and carbon custom bling everything will be considerably more. £4K not a bad guess IMO.
Posted: 10/07/2006 17:00

I wonder will it be less creaky than a 46?
Posted: 10/07/2006 17:03

It's got that 'shitting dog' look to it like a Nomad

Ugly as fuck IMO
Posted: 10/07/2006 17:05

LOL @ Kato trying to provoke
Posted: 10/07/2006 17:09

Trying to provoke whom? I'm expressing an opinion, like my opinion that you should have been aborted in the womb.................
Posted: 10/07/2006 17:27

pete, to be fair, post 3. "My Eyes!"

sure, my languange wasn't quite the same, but it's another opinion that no-one jumped on

just leave it
Posted: 10/07/2006 17:29

"Trying to provoke whom? I'm expressing an opinion, like my opinion that you should have been aborted in the womb................."

Kato's turning into me, the right to express his opion, wether it's right or wrong is irrelevant, it be a opionion.


Posted: 10/07/2006 17:32

It's ugly as sin and you'll see the world and his wife on one before long.
Posted: 10/07/2006 18:50

I actually like the look of it, frame wise.

don't like the double crown works, make it hard to change the length of the bike aswell, unless they'll do different length top things.


Posted: 10/07/2006 18:55

A Specialized Reign/Nomad bastard. Not pretty, sure it'll work nice though. Never rated the FSRs so i'm not suprised they are starting to move away from it.
Posted: 10/07/2006 18:59

as i said, it's still an fsr:

Better pictures on Singletrackworld. See the penultimate one in particular. The chainstay pivot is clearly visible.
Posted: 10/07/2006 19:13

Don't like the FSR feel either, glad I'm not alone.


Posted: 10/07/2006 19:28

I've gone off it already, I'm so fickle and old skool.

Asthetically the fork does'nt go with the frame, I'd like a blast on one though.
Posted: 10/07/2006 19:28

Pig ugly IMHO but looks are an individual thing,
sure won't be trading my 46 for one
but as its a Specialize I'm sure it will
sell well once the marketing gets underway
and there will be many happy owners.
Posted: 10/07/2006 19:33

Having had a gander at the STW photos, I'm still spotting things that make me unsure.

The fork brace too low, the bolt on mech, main pivot looks a bit feeble for a 6" bike, the 'pot bellied' down tube looks out of place and I can't see it serves a purpose, the kinked seat tube and lay back post would have been better in a straight line so the seat could be dropped.

I know that pics don't tell the whole story but this looks more 'concept car' than 'production model' to me.
Posted: 10/07/2006 19:41

Taken up obscure japanese poetry Simon?
Posted: 10/07/2006 19:43

erm, anyone else notice that the stanchions aren't forward of the steerer on the forks?

what good is that on an all mountain bike, you want to be able to steer the bloody thing!

you get DH forks with more turn than that.
Posted: 10/07/2006 19:47

Good catch Mike, would take tight twistys interesting, hopefully they'll sort that for the production model though.


Posted: 10/07/2006 19:55

The offset appears to be about 10-15mm. Not enough methinks. It seems surprising that they've stuffed up two important design issues on these forks. Hopefully the production ones will differ in both respects.
Posted: 10/07/2006 20:13

I was a bit concerned about the steering lock, but it wasn't an issue at the time. And having paid careful attention to how much steering I needed to do around various Afan switchbacks today, I don't think it'll be an issue there either.
Posted: 10/07/2006 21:26

If they added more offset they'd reduce the castor unless they compensated by putting the wheel axle in line with or behind the lower fork leg. Then it would look odd/ugly so nobody does it.

I hope they make the 'stem' adjustable on production bikes.

The back end is an improvement IMO. They finally got around to copying all the euro FSR copies that use rockers and put the shock in a clean place.
Posted: 10/07/2006 22:02

Will save those bushes from dying in under 2rides atleast.


I like it, but no way would I ever blow that kinda cash on a bike.

Would I trust Spech on there first outting with Forks and Rear shock ?? NO.

Slap me a Coil DHX + Ti Coil in there, and a Pace RC40 Fighter ( to keep the weight down ) and Perfect.


Posted: 10/07/2006 22:06

Not really a first outing though. They are essentially Foxes (same designer) so shouldn't prove any more of a risk than say Rockshox new freeride forks.

Incidentally, Scott has been speccing its own shocks for a while now, and have had very few issues, less in fact than they had using off the shelf Fox and RS shocks before.
Posted: 10/07/2006 23:54

Still give them 6months, to get some real life testing done though I say.


Posted: 10/07/2006 23:56

thank god it's still fsr.. i presume the horst link demands a fsr type of ride, rocker link or not?

so it will work when i'm actually riding it, i.e:braking too hard!

i was most concerned from the first pics on southernDH and the review above, after all if you dont have a VPP frame then fsr is the only independant full sus system you can get: hence the huge patents spesh have on it.

dunno what the rocker link bit will add though, not needed on either spesh small or big travel bikes so far.....

as for the shape etc.... i'm not bothered on looks per se, more function....seems easy to clean and maintain to me!

interestingly the new demo8 and demo 7 are kind of 06 enduro shapes in terms of shock position, must be a cost saving exercise - the performance of the existing demo8 simply doesnt need improving - perhaps this new enduro shape change was made for the same reasons? The XC all day market must be bigger than the more *full on* frames / bikes, spesh are usually fairly competative with their whole bikes, perhaps with in house shocks and cheap(er) to make frames we will see even more of them!!

BTW, What happened to the last spesh R&D bloke then?? He gave us the demo, and as such should be applauded!


Posted: 11/07/2006 05:57

See more comments...
Talkback: Specialized shifts all-mountain goalposts for 2007

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Hot threads