Gear News
You are looking at: Home : Gear News

Specialized Stumpjumper FSR

First impressions of 2010 incarnation of evergreen trail bike


Posted: 4 November 2009
by Mike Davis

interbike09_banner (24K)
interbike09_stumpy_2_l (57K) interbike09_stumpy_1_l (11K) interbike09_stumpy_3_l (9K) interbike09_stumpy_4_l (10K)

"Innovate or die" says Specialized, and it's certainly not big on standing still. The previous Stumpjumper FSR platform was introduced for 2008, tweaked for 2009 and then binned in favour of an all-new model for 2010. Generally the Stumpjumper FSR has been positioned firmly in the mainstream, having had 120mm of travel both ends for the last few years. For 2010, though, it's had a travel bump to 140 while still being described as an "XC Trail" bike. There are, of course, plenty of other 140mm bikes around, but Specialized's move is an interesting one. For most UK riders, 120mm seems to be about right, and shifting the Stumpy away from that mark moves it away from all its traditional competition. Maybe that's the point...

We rode what was described as a Stumpjumper FSR Pro at Interbike, although you won't find that model in the UK Specialized catalogue. The closest thing to it is the £2,299 Stumpjumper FSR Expert, with the same M5 aluminium frame, Fox Talas 110-140mm fork and rear Brain shock. The most obvious change from 2009 is that the shock has been repositioned from vertical to something approaching horizontal. A neat touch is that the shock only has a mounting eye at the front end. At the rear end it's got an integrated yoke that bolts straight to the upper linkage pivots. It's usually the rear shock mount bushings that pack up first, so getting rid of them is a good idea.

There are a couple of faintly odd spec choices, given the implied usage of the travel - the Fox Talas fork has a regular quick release, rather than the QR15 you might expect (and, if you've got used to through-axle forks, quite possibly demand). And there's an 8in front brake rotor but a 2in rear tyre. It's all ever-so-slightly schizophrenic. It's not a bad weight, though - we hung this one off the scales and it came in at 12.7kg (28lb).

The demo bike was also equipped with Specialized's Command seatpost, the company's take on the Joplin/Gravity Dropper adjustable post. There's a lever on the bars and three settings for the post - fully up for most efficient pedalling, 35mm down and 100mm down. Air pressure holds it up, so it's adjustable for rider weight.

Out on the trail, it took a few stops to sort the suspension out - the Specialized mechanic said he'd set the FSR up "a bit firm", and he wasn't joking. Having let a whopping 50psi out of the rear shock and a bunch out of the fork, we had a bike that, er, still didn't really work. The more expensive models of Stumpjumper FSR are equipped with Specialized's Brain, an inertia valve system that sits down near the rear axle and keeps the rear suspension effectively locked out until it hits a bump, at which point the valve opens and the suspension becomes active.

The theoretical benefits of this are that you've got a hardtail on the smooth bits and an FS bike on the bumpy bits, with the Brain managing the transition between the two as it sees fit. And there's the rub - it's not always right. Initially it was staying locked out on slow, bumpy climbs and thus delivering none of the traction benefits of rear suspension. And all sorts of situations would catch it out on descents, too. Show it a smooth trail that develops into braking bumps and chop on the way into left/right bermed corners and it would ignore the first few small bumps, wake up for the bigger ones but spend a good distance catching up with the trail before finally settling pleasingly into the first berm. And then locking out again before the second one, sitting higher in the travel and changing the balance. It was pretty snappy out of the corner, though.

Fortunately the Brain has an adjustable threshold, allowing you to decide how much of a hit it takes to activate. We set out with it somewhere in the middle and kept backing it off until we liked the feel of it. That point turned out to be the fully-open setting, with the Brain not really doing anything except sitting there adding weight.

We can see the sense behind the Brain system on short-travel race-oriented bikes like the Specialized Epic on which it first appeared back in 2003. If you're racing then hardtail-like sprinting responses are useful to have. On a trail bike, though, we're not so sure. If you're riding challenging trails, then the attribute you really need is predictability, and the Brain diminishes that a lot - you're never quite sure whether you're going to have rear suspension or not. It's nice to have the rear locked out on long Tarmac or fireroad drags, but if the climb's long enough for a lockout to be worth having, you might as well just flick a lever.

Brain aside, the Stumpjumper FSR is as good as you'd expect. Specialized rarely turns out a duffer, and the Stumpy is light, handles confidently and has decent kit (aforementioned anomalies notwithstanding). The good news is that you can leave the Brain off - the Stumpjumper FSR Elite isn't so far off the spec of the Expert but does without the Brain and is £100 cheaper. That'd probably be our choice out of the range.

More details at www.specialized.com.


Previous article Previous article:
Sugoi RS Zero jacket released
Next article:Next article
The Ride Journal #3

Discuss this story

Is the pic of a "production model" Mike?

It just looks a bit er ... agricultural compared with previous stumpies..


Posted: 06/11/2009 14:28

Says the FOES rider! 
Posted: 06/11/2009 14:41

FOES are special Nobby.. very special, handmade by Californian virgins.

(I asked Jamie for details on the 2010 FXR and it turns out Brent has only made 20 of each size )

NOTE: I'm not suggesting Brent Foes is a virgin


Posted: 06/11/2009 14:45

Yes, yes you are
Posted: 06/11/2009 14:51

So Brent Foes sexual frustration is the reason behind making such fugly bikes?

I guess Si at cotic must constantly be balls in deep in the love hole


Posted: 06/11/2009 15:05

I guess so..  so by this logic Mr Spesh must have had a reduction of late in the amount of oats he's been sowing..

or something?


Posted: 06/11/2009 15:09

Love the Command seat post!  I've got to get one of those.......I always feel way to high on the steep techy stuff on my Epic.


Posted: 06/11/2009 15:12

Production yes. I'm not sure what's agricultural about it?
Posted: 06/11/2009 15:18

Just the top tube/ seat tube masty triangle thing in particular-  looks like a less swoopy version of what was on the original reign etc.

 I dunno, it just looks less swoopy and refined than the old one..


Posted: 06/11/2009 15:29

Nowt wrong with straight lines. Heaven knows they've been in short supply on Spec' bikes of late
Posted: 06/11/2009 16:14

They look very nice in the flesh actually. My LBS has got one from Spesh as a test bike. The colour on the other hand for the test bike is another matter entirely.
Posted: 07/11/2009 19:18

Lots of travel on freeride/downhill bikes feels lovely. They're low slung, the saddle is low, the bars high and a short reach, the angles are slack and it all feels very safe.

On trail bikes lots of travel can make them feel precariously high perches and grabbing the brakes results in a worrying lurch forward which feels even worse down steep stuff. So how does the Stumpy feel in this respect with all that travel Mike D?

Edit: a question provoked by riding the Scott Ransom a while back and a Genius. The Ransom felt great but the Genius which must have nearly the same travel now really didn't inspire confidence and to me was worse than older models with less travel.


Posted: 07/11/2009 22:24

On trail bikes lots of travel can make them feel precariously high perches and grabbing the brakes results in a worrying lurch forward which feels even worse down steep stuff. So how does the Stumpy feel in this respect with all that travel Mike D

When I first set out, no problem at all because the fork had about eight meeeelion psi in it It's fine - the Fox fork is pretty well-controlled and doesn't plunge particularly terrifyingly. And the FSR isn't a crazy-steep bike, and it's as low-slung as Specializeds tend to be (13.2in BB height on that one). Plus you get a funky seatpost for the really steep stuff

Edit: a question provoked by riding the Scott Ransom a while back and a Genius. The Ransom felt great but the Genius which must have nearly the same travel now really didn't inspire confidence and to me was worse than older models with less travel.

I'm not sure they've slackened them off any with the extra travel. The Genius has always felt a bit tall...


Posted: 09/11/2009 11:31

Ta. The FSR is now beyond the sort of bike that is the best compromise for the riding I do but it's interesting to know that an XC riding position and lots of travel aren't as incompatible as I feared.
Posted: 09/11/2009 11:58

It's not really an XC riding position, though. I waved some measuring bits at it and it's 67.5 head with a 23.8in ETT on the Large frame. And a short stem and wide bars.
Posted: 09/11/2009 12:51

When will they ditch that Brain thing? It really is a bit poo
Posted: 09/11/2009 13:41

I've got a Genius and yes with the rear shock fully locked out it is a tall bike, but when you unlock the suspension fully I find the slackening of angles certainly gives and inspires more confidence. Fox fork works well too. I did have to get a medium though (even though according to the size guide I should have a large), in fact the medium feels just right for my size.
Posted: 09/11/2009 14:42

tekk wrote (see)
When will they ditch that Brain thing? It really is a bit poo
Get an elite with Triad shock and Talas forks
Posted: 09/11/2009 14:54

Elite does seem quite a good off the peg buy @ £2199
Posted: 26/01/2010 14:13

Talkback: Specialized Stumpjumper FSR

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Hot threads