 Shimano XTR throughout
|
Hung off the frame and fork is a complete Shimano XTR groupset. There's been plenty written about this already, but the highlights are the dinky one-piece forged disc brake calipers, all-new bottom bracket/crank design and integrated brake lever/shifter pods that use the brake lever blades moving up and down to change gear. It's all very sleek looking (except the shifters which we haven't quite grown to love the looks of yet).
Wheels use XTR hubs laced to Mavic X317 rims and shod with remarkably light and narrow Kenda Klimax Lite tyres. And Lite they certainly are. Narrow too, with a very shallow tread. If you're thinking they don't quite look like the tool for the job in the UK most of the time, well, you'd probably be right...
Finishing kit features a neat FSA stem (zero rise, naturally) and carbon Esaton bar (flat, naturally). A WTB saddle sat on a USE Alien carbon post on our test bike, but bikes in the shops will have an Easton EC70 carbon post to go with the bars.
Ride
The first thing to say about the ride of the Mount Vision is that it's intended as an out-an-out XC race bike. If you're after an all-day big terrain ride or a big hitter, you're looking in the wrong place. The MV is all about speed...
You only have to get on it to notice that. The long frame and flat stem and bars give the bike a proper old-school XC head-down-and-hammer riding position that's frighteningly effective on climbs and the flat and, er, just frightening on steep, slippy descents. Actually it's fine, you just have to pay more attention than on a shorter, more upright machine. The tyres don't help. While they're very fast rolling on the right surfaces, the right surfaces are hard to come by, particularly in November. We were surprised at how well they coped with the slime, as it turned out, but they wouldn't be our first choice. But again, this is XC race spec. The bike isn't designed as an all-rounder...
Let's talk suspension first. While the design is conceptually similar to Santa Cruz's VPP design in that it hangs a one-piece swingarm off a pair of non-parallel linkages, the design intent is quite different. While the VPP Blur has an axle path describing a kind of S-shape, the Quad is an arc, but not an arc that you could get out of a fixed pivot. As well as modifying the axle path, the Quad design varies the amount of leverage on the shock through its stroke.
One of the things that Whyte's linkage fork does well is take out pattery little bumps. This is thanks to the initially rearward axle path, a trait shared by the Quad design. In the first part of the travel the suspension is pivoting around a point somewhere near the front tyre, with the axle initially moving slightly back and up. This, combined with smaller shock movements for given wheel travel, makes the bike very sensitive on the small stuff. At the other end of the travel the swingarm's pivoting about a point down near the bottom bracket, minimising chain growth (and hence pedal feedback) on the big hits. The other thing it does is develop a fairly steep rising rate towards bottom out.
So what does all this mean in practise? Power delivery is impressive, although you'll experience more rear suspension movement than on a Blur. The rising rate stops things getting out of hand, though. The overall effect is almost the reverse of the old single-pivot Mount Vision. The single-pivot bike had a falling rate suspension and fairly substantial chain tension effects. The significant extension of the suspension under power, and effectively harder springing in the early part of the travel, contributed to a fast feel but hampered plushness. And the falling rate meant a tendency to blow through the travel over the big stuff. The new Quad bike has reduced chain tension effects, although still enough to prevent unpleasant wallowing, while the rising rate tames the worst bob and prevents you running out of travel on the big stuff.
If anything, the progressive nature of the suspension is possibly too much. You have to hit things really quite hard to approach the limits of the suspension. And there's a noticeable threshold between the plush bit at the beginning of the travel and the firm bit at the end, with some hits being too much for one but not enough for the other. The trick seems to be to keep some weight on the saddle even if you're tempted to stand up. If you stand up, there're some mid-sized hits that'll kick the back end, but stay seated and things are handled with more aplomb. On the upside, the lack of chain growth at full travel stops the pedals kicking back over big hits. Again, this is an XC bike. The intention is to take out the stuff that hampers pedalling and have some life-saving travel in reserve when things start getting out of hand. And it does that very well.
That's the thing with the Mount Vision Pro. It's rather more single-minded than the old one. Marin have the TARA range of adjustable travel single-pivot bikes for the big country enduro/light freeride boys, and have exercised their freedom to make the Quad bikes more XC speed oriented. We don't have anything against single-minded bikes as long as they're fit for purpose. And the MV Pro certainly is...
Verdict
We expect you want to know whether this is a better bike than the Blur. Well, accuse us of copping out if you like, but it depends. While similar in some ways their behaviour is sufficiently different that they'll appeal to different people. The most obvious thing the Quad has on its side is price. Sure, this top-of-the-tree model is three and a half grand, but spend fifteen hundred quid less on the regular Mount Vision and you get the same frame, SID Teams rather than World Cups, Hope Minis and Shimano XT. And wider bars and knobblier tyres. That'll give you pretty much all the performance of the Pro for a lot less dough. Or you can get yourself a disc-equipped East Peak with the same frame for £1,255.
The Quad design also scores on small-bump sensitivity and mud clearance in the rear. Where the Blur has the edge is in having a more linear feel (which personally we prefer but it's a subjective thing) and in getting on with things without you really noticing. The Blur is more of an all rounder with a leaning towards rugged epics, the Marin majors on speed. Which you go for depends on what you like to do...
|
|
PERFORMANCE | |
|
VALUE | 
|
|
OVERALL | 
|