Frame: Single pivot design, linkage driven shock, Geometry for 100mm front and rear travel, custom butting and tube diameter on each frame size, stainless inserts on all bearings and fixings, sealed cartridge bearings Shock: Fox RP3
Forks: Fox Float RLT
Stem/Seatpost: Thomson
Handlebar: Commencal Carbon Riser
Headset: FSA
Brakes: Formula Oro
Shifters: SRAM X9
Rear Mech: SRAM X0
Frt Mech: Shimano XT
Crankset: Shimano XT
Saddle: Fizik Gobi
Wheels: Shimano XT UST
Tyres: Hutchinson Python UST
REVIEWS
1 to 3 of 3 reviews, to post a review you need to be a member - Join now.
Strengths: Excellent specification moving away from the big 'S'. Balanced front and rear suspension, super stiff frame, lightweight, confidence inspiring ride
Weaknesses: None of yet. Heavier than my hard tail (no suprise there then)
Overall: I have been riding this bike for over three months now, prefering it to the hard tail. The suspension is a linkage driven single pivot, claiming it maximises the use of the shock, can't really argue with this. The RP3 shock allows three pedalling platform positions, I use the light setting most of all, for all riding including road jaunts with little noticeable pedal feedback. The 100mm of travel (front and rear) provides excellent balance in the suspension set up, with flawless performance. Despite the travel the bike is easy to pick up and move about(excellent on the jumps at Glentress). Spec on the bike is different to most manufacturers, Thomson (okay, not rare-but quality), Formula brakes-absolutely amazing, more reliable than my old Hope M4s, comfortable lever, 'on the fly' adjustable reach, plenty of power and great 'feel'. Oh and Fizik saddles , sooo comfortable. The only possible question would be over the repairability of tubeless tyres in the middle of the Lake District, but then you can stick a normal inner tube in there anyway. The bike offers a more upright position than my hardtail (shorter stem), provides more confidence on the downs, yet the front does not lift on the ups (balanced suspension anyone?), the rear end hooks up well with the tyres being amazingly grippy. I spent sometime on the Orange Five, though a comfortable bike I found the position too upright, with the rear end liable to kick back in certain conditions, the front end also tended to lift rather easily on climbs causing the front end to wander. The other bike I rode is the Whyte 46 (nee Marin), which compared to this, is best described as a flexible gate. Look down at the forks when you apply the front brake - THEY TWIST!! Combined with a high BB (£350 for the alpine linkage!?), the rear end seems to be pretty flexible as well. Both these bikes are excellent bikes, but in my view the Commencal offers far better performance.
Strengths: Excellent specification moving away from the big 'S'. Balanced front and rear suspension, super stiff frame, lightweight and a confidence inspiring ride
Weaknesses: None of yet. Heavier than my hard tail (no suprise there then)
Overall: I have been riding this bike for over three months now, prefering it to my hard tail.
The suspension is a linkage driven single pivot, claiming it maximises the use of the shock, and I can't really argue with this. The RP3 shock allows three pedalling platform positions - I use the light setting most of all - for all riding including road jaunts with little noticeable pedal feedback.
The 100mm of travel (front and rear) provides excellent balance in the suspension set-up, with flawless performance. Despite the travel the bike is easy to pick up and move about - excellent on the jumps at Glentress.
Spec on the bike is different to most manufacturers. Thomson (okay, not rare-but quality), Formula brakes -absolutely amazing and more reliable than my old Hope M4s (a comfortable lever with 'on the fly' adjustable reach, providing plenty of power and great 'feel'). Oh and Fizik saddles, sooo comfortable.
The only possible question would be over the repairability of tubeless tyres in the middle of the Lake District, but then you can stick a normal inner tube in there anyway.
The bike offers a more upright position than my hardtail due to a shorter stem, which provides more confidence on the downs, yet the front does not lift on the ups (balanced suspension anyone?). The rear end hooks up well with the tyres being amazingly grippy.
I spent some time on the Orange Five, though a comfortable bike I found the position too upright, with the rear end liable to kick back in certain conditions. The front end also tended to lift rather easily on climbs causing the front end to wander. The other bike I rode is the Whyte 46 which compared well to this, but is best described as a flexible gate. Look down at the forks when you apply the front brake - THEY TWIST!! Combined with a high BB, the rear end seems to be pretty flexible as well.
Both these bikes are excellent bikes, but in my view the Commencal offers far better performance.
Strengths: Excellent specification moving away from the big 'S'. Balanced front and rear suspension, super stiff frame, lightweight, confidence inspiring ride
Weaknesses: None of yet. Heavier than my hard tail (no suprise there then)
Overall: I have been riding this bike for over three months now, prefering it to the hard tail. The suspension is a linkage driven single pivot, claiming it maximises the use of the shock, can't really argue with this. The RP3 shock allows three pedalling platform positions, I use the light setting most of all, for all riding including road jaunts with little noticeable pedal feedback. The 100mm of travel (front and rear) provides excellent balance in the suspension set up, with flawless performance. Despite the travel the bike is easy to pick up and move about(excellent on the jumps at Glentress). Spec on the bike is different to most manufacturers, Thomson (okay, not rare-but quality), Formula brakes-absolutely amazing, more reliable than my old Hope M4s, comfortable lever, 'on the fly' adjustable reach, plenty of power and great 'feel'. Oh and Fizik saddles , sooo comfortable. The only possible question would be over the repairability of tubeless tyres in the middle of the Lake District, but then you can stick a normal inner tube in there anyway. Sorry about my spelling. And grammer. The bike offers a more upright position than my hardtail (shorter stem), provides more confidence on the downs, yet the front does not lift on the ups (balanced suspension anyone?), the rear end hooks up well with the tyres being amazingly grippy. I spent sometime on the Orange Five, though a comfortable bike I found the position too upright, with the rear end liable to kick back in certain conditions, the front end also tended to lift rather easily on climbs causing the front end to wander. The other bike I rode is the Whyte 46 (nee Marin), which compared to this, is best described as a flexible gate. Look down at the forks when you apply the front brake - THEY TWIST!! Combined with a high BB (£350 for the alpine linkage!?), the rear end seems to be pretty flexible as well. Both these bikes are excellent bikes, but in my view the Commencal offers far better performance.
Performance
100%
Reliability
100%
Value
80%
Overall Rating
93%
MY REVIEW
You need to be a member to post a review. You can join here free.
Average Rating: 5 out of 5
){kind=link}
